no......have you not seen 300! nukes would not stop the spartansSeriously, think Xerxes. If he had nukes where do you think we'd be now?
Yay, nukes cannot defeat me!Gauss said:no......have you not seen 300! nukes would not stop the spartans![]()
"Almost" meaning most things. the NWO is not rubish. However the fact that its going to be peaceful ect ect is rubishGauss said:do not use Bush as proof.....almost everything that comes out of his mouth is rubbish
I have a video of Gordon Brown saying the words New World Order.dumarab said:Btw many world leaders said an almost same speech at about the same time as bush.
*disappears*Schroedinger said:I read about the new world order on a website 8 years ago. I went back today and it was gone.
CONSPIRACYYYYYYY
=Dari89 said:George Bush is a reptilian shape shifter.
I swear...the crazy guy told me.
Well he isn't really crazy, it is just that the all powerful one world government declared him crazy so that he wouldn't expose the plot of world domination!
Yeah, but did he have nucks?ari89 said:These people don't know what they're talking about.
Seriously, think Xerxes. If he had nukes where do you think we'd be now?
omg! So that's why they invaded Iraq?!dumarab said:bro the Mossad and the CIA were the founders of the NWO.
btw there is a NWO.
President Bush's speech to Congress
March 6, 1991 (extracts). This speech has often been cited as the US administration’s principal policy statement on the new order in the Middle East following the expulsion of Iraqi forces from Kuwait.
Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a "world order" in which "the principles of justice and fair play ... protect the weak against the strong ..." A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfil the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.
The Gulf war put this new world to its first test, and, my fellow Americans, we passed that test.
First take down Iraq and iran. the two major threats in the middle east. But before doing that lets see if we can get them to take each other down in the Iraq-Iran war. So what did they do tell iraq that iran been steeling oil of them. and vise versa? of course arabs are angry boom boom. War
don't you see mate?
UN doesn't do shit. It's just the name.bigboyjames said:anyone that takes the UN seriously is fucked up.
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]the UN has proven on many occasions to be all talk and no action. At least no effective, positive, productive action. big worded resolutions have no effect on heavily-armed dictators.[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica] its a fucking waste of space.[/FONT]dumarab said:UN doesn't do shit. It's just the name.
bigboyjames said:[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica][COLOR=#000000
FUCK THE UN. it was created to control the world, league of nations failed and sooner or later the UN will fail as well.[/QUOTE]
the league of nations was created to break down the barriers between nations to mock the idea of nationalism. The UN is now being used as a jury room for the worlds problems (not working as we see every single day).
every organisation that seeks to combine nations and discuss world issues is just another step towards a singular government.
on the issue central banks weren't created simply "for ease of money transactions"
having a single entity to deal with is the perfect way to get things done quickly
*votes BNP*Schroedinger said:Nationalism is a fucking joke.