iMatthew
Woolworthian
Hey! Awesome to have people from different divisions on here.
Agree with imathew sounds as if this would fall under your normal grade so no extra money . But you should have a quiet word with your union rep .hey, my manager asked me to start maintaining inventory for a section, so just with the RF gun and autostockr,
but being classified as just a store team member, does this fall outside my duties? and who is supposed to do it?
(i get different answers depending on who i ask at my store)
don't have to deal with trucks or drivers, so haven't noticed.How are you guys in the stores finding the change over from the Woolworth drivers to Linfox drivers ? Any difference .
Not sure what you mean by glitching... I managed to get my group certificate off epayslips yesterday, filed my tax return before this all-night-outage.is everyone elses group certificates glitching?
This could be accurate. We're getting a new payroll system apparently. You have started using it?What's up with this new Kronos system? Our SSO went through and deleted everyone who had supervision codes who wasn't contracted a supervision shift, and said told us that people listed as a Supervisor on the register will be paid supervisor rates. I didn't think this was true though... wouldn't they have the be entered into People Planner has supervision?
im in frontend...Sounds like a task they would have a nontrade employee do, are you still in the grocery department?
That's what I'm saying. I believe the new agreement said that anybody who performs the role of supervision (despite not being rostered), should get the appropriate rate. Something they neglected to do prior, and probably still do.im in frontend...
on current topic:
but if the supervisor is on break, whos in charge? without a supervisor, our whole store would go to shit in 10 mins.
and all our supervisors perform supervision tasks even when theyre not rostered as one, so maybe they should be getting paid...
I think this whole thing is wrong...so anyone who ever supers will be paid that at all times? is that what i'm hearing?
i dont think you see the problem, as a supervisor (and just like all the other supervisors), if im rostered or not, i still manage complaints, refunds, exchanges, breaks, assisting other cashiers, service calls, bus tickets, ISIS, office, Storenet, wow money, carpet cleaners, announcements, cleaning, answer phones, assign duties, manage the floor etc etc etcI think this whole thing is wrong...
All the agreement lists is the paygrades. It's highly unlikely the company would lock itself into paying people higher rates when they only perform those duties on a shift-by-shift basis.
At least at my store, the idea for the EBA employees is that there is only ever one person rostered as supervisor and that is the only person who will be payed supervision for that shift. If you supervise for a lunch break, it's only 1 hour and tough luck you won't get extra. The only time I've been paid supervision when rostered as an operator is when the night supervisor worked in cash office; she signed an adjustment for three hours and I signed one for the same hours as supervisor and got paid appropriately.
I agree with you, however one could argue that most things in that list falls under the role of a service cashier anyway (breaks, assisting other cashiers, storenet, wow money, carpet cleaners, announcements, cleaning, answering phones). They aren't purely supervision duties.i dont think you see the problem, as a supervisor (and just like all the other supervisors), if im rostered or not, i still manage complaints, refunds, exchanges, breaks, assisting other cashiers, service calls, bus tickets, ISIS, office, Storenet, wow money, carpet cleaners, announcements, cleaning, answer phones, assign duties, manage the floor etc etc etc
so why shouldnt i get paid?
OR should i do none of that work and leave it all to the supervisor?