fatguy said:It was soooo easy... i finished in 40 mins and filled 4 booklets
I hope your just being sarcastic,
and mimicking a lot of people on this wwebsite.
the exam starts in 2 and a half hours
Cramming quotes in.
good luck =]
Check out my thread, keep the general thoughts thread general. Did u have any orthadoxy on her images, Yates, Strong and Hackett are all art historians critical of the 'propagandist commissioned images', you should be fine with just the Neale-Elton debate for policy.navelj said:I thought the case study question was great, because it seems to have not wanted info on the historians' contexts - BUT PLEASE TELL ME I'M RIGHT - because that's what i'm stressing most over. I did Elizabeth 1 - ANYONE ELSE DO ELIZABETH?????? I focused on her image - mainly the cult of Elizabeth (Yates, Strong & Hackett) and her parliamentary policy (Neale and Elton) i thought that i answered the question well and thought the "challenging old accepted interpretations" fit well with Elizabeth. I wrote 15 pages for this section and ended with the quote from Pieter Geyl "history is an argument without end".