ilovecommunism
Member
回复: Re: Traditional of Simplified characters, and why?
Before defining the difference between "traditional" and "simplified" Chinese, I think one question should be taken into consideration: What is the objective figure and trait of having the nature of being traditional.
One thing quite interesting is that, at the time when now so-called "TRADITIONAL" characters were first invented, they were also appeared as the simplified form of chinese characters at that time. This is because they were originated from a kind of Chinese characters called "Qin Zhuan" or "Xiao Zhuan", and "Qin Zhuan" was the simplified form of "Da Zhuan", which was used in the society of Qin Kingdom before the unity of seven kingdoms (and those 6 other kindoms also had their own forms of characters). Therefore, you can say, the so-called "traditional characters of Chinese" do not objectively hold the nature of being "traditional". And the reason why people in these days define these "Traditional Characters" as "having the nature of being 'traditional'", is only because the length of time such forms of characters have/had existed in the history of China.
So, now let's adjust our clocks a bit further to the future, let's say, 2000 years after, if the now so-called "simplified Chinese characters" still exist at that time, would you think they can be defined as "traditional characters" by our offsprings, as how we define the characters invented by our ancestors now?
Lol... traditional characters were also evolved from ancient Chinese characters invented thousands of years ago.It's what Chinese writings evolved from and should endure that way until the end.
Before defining the difference between "traditional" and "simplified" Chinese, I think one question should be taken into consideration: What is the objective figure and trait of having the nature of being traditional.
One thing quite interesting is that, at the time when now so-called "TRADITIONAL" characters were first invented, they were also appeared as the simplified form of chinese characters at that time. This is because they were originated from a kind of Chinese characters called "Qin Zhuan" or "Xiao Zhuan", and "Qin Zhuan" was the simplified form of "Da Zhuan", which was used in the society of Qin Kingdom before the unity of seven kingdoms (and those 6 other kindoms also had their own forms of characters). Therefore, you can say, the so-called "traditional characters of Chinese" do not objectively hold the nature of being "traditional". And the reason why people in these days define these "Traditional Characters" as "having the nature of being 'traditional'", is only because the length of time such forms of characters have/had existed in the history of China.
So, now let's adjust our clocks a bit further to the future, let's say, 2000 years after, if the now so-called "simplified Chinese characters" still exist at that time, would you think they can be defined as "traditional characters" by our offsprings, as how we define the characters invented by our ancestors now?
Last edited: