Trick Question (1 Viewer)

azureus88

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
278
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
True or false:

[maths]\int_{0}^{1}\frac{dt}{1+t^n}\leq \int_{0}^{1}\frac{dt}{1+t^{n+1}}[/maths] for n=1,2,3,...

It's false cause they cant be equal right?
 

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
i don't think they can be equal
 
Last edited:

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
True or false:

[maths]\int_{0}^{1}\frac{dt}{1+t^n}\leq \int_{0}^{1}\frac{dt}{1+t^{n+1}}[/maths] for n=1,2,3,...

It's false cause they cant be equal right?

Over the closed interval [0,1], both integrands are positive and 1/(1 + t^n) is <= 1/(1 + t^(n+1) ); Therefore the left integral <= the right one; i.e. statement is true.
 
Last edited:

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
1/(1+tn) <= 1/(1+tn+1) for 0 <= t <= 1
but the equality only exists when t = 0, 1
as the integral also has all other values in the range, it can't be equal
 

hermand

je t'aime.
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
1,432
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
1/(1+tn) <= 1/(1+tn+1) for 0 <= t <= 1
but the equality only exists when t = 0, 1
as the integral also has all other values in the range, it can't be equal
but it doesn't have to be all values are equal, just one possible value needs to be equal for it to satisfy that statement.
 

azureus88

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
278
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
but it doesn't have to be all values are equal, just one possible value needs to be equal for it to satisfy that statement.
only t = 0, 1 satifies the inequality 1/(1+t<SUP>n</SUP>) <= 1/(1+t<SUP>n+1</SUP>)

But as the question is asking about the integral (ie. area under the curve from 0 to 1), i dont think any value of n will satisfy the inequality(the one in the question).
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The integral on the left is less than the right, but the statement is true. means less than or equal to, with the "or" clearly being exclusive or, so there is nothing wrong with that since only one has to be valid ie and are both true.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top