Weird moderation and how does this work? (1 Viewer)

[xmysteriousx]

this person ranked 4th overall in this subject and came 1st in NSW for that subject.
Whereas the guy who came 1st throughout the year came 4th in NSW for that subject.

How does this work?

 

[enoilgam]

First guy probably beat the second guy by a fair margin in the final exam.

 

[xmysteriousx]

What do u mean by fair margin?
The guy who came first his internal mark ( before moderation) was in the 90s%
whereas the guy who came 4th, his internal mark( before moderation ) was in the 80s.
But on the hsc, the guy who came 4th did so well and came 1st in NSW.
Whereas the guy who came first internally came 4th in NSW?

The one who came 2nd internally came 5th in nsw, and the one who came 3rd i think came 8th in NSW.

 

[Alkanes]

He killed externals? Unpredictable on how the board determines state ranks tbh.

 

[xmysteriousx]

yes, the guy who came 4th internally raped his externals.
He told me he stuffed up his trials for that subject......
but he worked hard between the after trial period and hsc.

that is amazing and inspiring!

 

[xmysteriousx]

He killed externals? Unpredictable on how the board determines state ranks tbh.

True, sometimes the board of studies is unpredictable.
Miracles do happen I guess? XD

 

[Alkanes]

What was your point on this thread?

 

[xmysteriousx]

What was your point on this thread?

Because for the nth time, I hear people saying that if you're not ranked first and even if you did well in the HSC your mark will go to the first student and bla bla bla and ranks are chronological.

but this case is weird......so I'm just wondering how is this moderated?
this is the point of my post.
WHY IS THIS CASE OF MODERATION PECULIAR in comparison to the ones the board told us when they came to our school??