were the 5yr plans a success? (1 Viewer)

~~Jess~~

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
116
Location
sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
i just skim read my text book and it seems they were pretty much a success cos they got all that heavy indsutry going and foreign trade...although i could be wrong. what are happened in the 5yr plans in a nutshell?
thanks in advance :)
 

launcher169

Lord of Chaos
Joined
Mar 22, 2004
Messages
154
Location
Kenthurst (Still in Sydney!) Just
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The Five Year Plans developed the Soviet Union's industrial sector.

the 1st 5YP introduced in 1928 called for the development of infrastructure, specifically that in heavy industry...so dams, railroads, electricity etc.
According to Stalin, it was so successful that after 4 years and 4 months he stopped it saying Russia was ready for the next area of development. (half way through 1933)

The 2nd 5YP introduced in 1933 called for the further development of infrastructure and heavy industry, but also began production of consumer goods to pay back the proletariat for all the work that they were doing. After 5 years Stalin closed this plan calling it a sucess (whether or not it actually achieved its purpose is debated)

The 3rd 5YP was initially going to move into light industry and consumer good production, but the tensions of WWII were building and Stalin began to develop the armament sector. - the war began in 1941
All of Russian industry on the west side of the Ural mountains were reduced and transported back to Siberia. There they were rebuilt and began to produce munitions for the war effort.

Was the FYP a success?
Disputable. Economically, it industrialised Russia. The focus was as some historians call it a 'Command economy' rather than a 'planned economy' where GOSPLAN did not plan economic development than Stalin set the agenda for economic devleopment and the plan changed when he wanted it to change. One historian (David Christian) argues that Russia was able to mobilise significant amounts of resources to achieve its economic goals, but was not able to use it efficiently or even effectively. One problem to be considered is that many of the experiance people (managers etc) were killed in the purges.

Socially, the FYP were a disaster for Russia. The standards of living enjoyed by the Russian people during this time were minimal. In some areas, even the basics were not provided to these people. Furthermore, the proletariat were pushed to extremes to fit their quotas. If they didnt, they were labelled Mensheviks and sent to gulags. The human costs of the FYP were enormous.

You know, while the FYP allowed Russia to effectively fight the war against Nazi Germany, was it worth the lives of millions of russian people?
 

Ziff

Active Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
2,366
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Yes, it was a "success" as the Piatileka (5YP) managed to rapidly industrialise Russia (and later helped her win the war), however, you should weigh this against the enormous human costs involved including what happened to people's lives, Stalin's overarching control of practically all aspects of Soviet life, what happened to Soviet culture (look up 'Socialist Realism'). The quality of life for the average Soviet citizen dropped enormously - it didn't pick up back to 1928 levels until the 1950s :eek:

Just re-read the chapter in light of this. Make a list or something of the good v. the bad (you can do this even by skimming)...

You should strive to balance your argument, 'yes, it did this' but the 'human cost' was pretty damn foul.
 

Fuckingoutofit

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
3
5yr AoK

The 5 year plans that Stalin introduced were a great success that help him personally and also helped the USSR economy to establish the heavy industry that was needed to help protect the large country. The victory in the 'Great Patriotic War' can be attributed to the success of the 5 year plans for the benefit of the industrial capacity of Russia. Also make mention the fact that the argriculture policy's while successful for Stalin created problems for ppl that lived of the land.

Socially, the 5Yr Plans were a disaster for Russia. The standards of living enjoyed by the Russian people during this time were minimal. In some areas, even the basics were not provided to these people. Furthermore, the proletariat were pushed to extremes to fit their quotas. If they didnt, they were labelled Mensheviks and sent to gulags. The human costs of the 5Yr Plans were enormous.

There u go ~~Jess~~
 

~~Jess~~

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
116
Location
sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
thanks every1! people on this forum really know their stuff! goodluck in the exams :)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top