whatNorthRiversMatt said:^^^ True that! Sex is good manner. Not slaving, sex buddy, one night stand and huge science experiment to keep your world spining! Jezze!
what?NorthRiversMatt said:^^^ True that! Sex is good manner. Not slaving, sex buddy, one night stand and huge science experiment to keep your world spining! Jezze!
He's NorthRiversMatt. He's a real, genuine, sweet, amazing person.^CoSMic DoRiS^^ said:Fuck I hope this guy is a troll.
-MuNcHKiN- said:not necessarily...
religion is to blame?jjsnax said:actually. Yes.
maybe not 'pre-historic' as such -
but the concept of virginity still retaining a degree of subjective value in our society roots indirectly from the influence of catholic church, and other religious institutions that enforce these fucked up 'conservative' values.
once again. religion is to blame. surprise surprise.
Pace_T said:religion is to blame?
more like contemporary standards are to blame
theres two sides to the coin here. you post assumes its best if we didnt have these values. why? because one person who regrets having sex with somebody should feel comfortable knowing everyone else is in the same boat?
but remember that was sex within marriage. casual sex at 12 or 13 can be pretty damaging.Riet said:Umm, actually people used to get married/have children when they were much younger.
How is sex within marriage when you're 12 or 13 different?evry1getscrewed said:but remember that was sex within marriage. casual sex at 12 or 13 can be pretty damaging.
I was merely trying to illustrate that her point that sex within marriage, at any age, is not traumatic when it clearly is (whether it's considered legal or not and when it occurred in history).Iron said:? But there would be no legal marriage in that case?
You can potentially marry at 16 if you have parental and court consent, but the reasons are usually limited to culture