what's the hardest question you've ever seen?? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter crynow
- Start date
macca202
Member
i just tried 2000's 3u hsc. Q 7 sucked balls. And it was only 3 u! whats going on there. if u actually can get it all out it takes like an hour anyway. now onto 4u........
Hey, how much 3U study are you doing compared to 4U same, less or more??
Hey, how much 3U study are you doing compared to 4U same, less or more??
BlackJack
Vertigo!
Don't know... a few candidates for it?
Why does 1+1=2?
Prove, using only maths, that the meaning of life, universe and everything is 42.
Is a cow when it spins? (valid question)
'99 Q8 b (v) (under time limit of 3 hhours after you did the whole exam
formulate a similar resutl for a cyclic n-gon?
I have no idea. If I meet the hardest one I'll forget because I can't do it.
Why does 1+1=2?
Prove, using only maths, that the meaning of life, universe and everything is 42.
Is a cow when it spins? (valid question)
'99 Q8 b (v) (under time limit of 3 hhours after you did the whole exam
formulate a similar resutl for a cyclic n-gon?
I have no idea. If I meet the hardest one I'll forget because I can't do it.
BlackJack
Vertigo!
Let's post this question then:
1989 Q8 (b)
The difference between a real number r and the greatest integer less than or eual to r is called the fractional part of r, F(r). Thus F(3.45) = 0.45...
NO! I GIVE UP! Just reading it is a pain! Ugh!!! Who has time to do this in a 3 hr exam?!
I'm sure 6 * 9 give 42... *cough*
1989 Q8 (b)
The difference between a real number r and the greatest integer less than or eual to r is called the fractional part of r, F(r). Thus F(3.45) = 0.45...
NO! I GIVE UP! Just reading it is a pain! Ugh!!! Who has time to do this in a 3 hr exam?!
I'm sure 6 * 9 give 42...
*cough*
6 * 7 ? Well that makes no sense at all ...Originally posted by Lazarus
Mr Adams later admitted that it was a mistake and that he meant to write 6 * 7, and you'll find that written in reprinted copies.
Mathematician
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2002
- Messages
- 188
Maybe
Maybe because 6 is regarded as evil and 7 is good.
Evil vs Good
Know what i mean?
Maybe because 6 is regarded as evil and 7 is good.
Evil vs Good
Know what i mean?
Maybe this one.
Prove the Riemann hypothesis: The Riemann zeta function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part ½:
Riemann hypothesis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Last edited:
nsw..wollongong
dentista 😍🫶
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
- Messages
- 3,191
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2023
how tf have u revived this thread
Maybe we can look at other things like this:
Prove or disprove:
And why would that be hard? Because it is undecidable (can’t be proved or disproved) as shown in 1963 by Paul Cohen:
Cohen, Paul J. (15 December 1963). "The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis, [part I]". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 50 (6): 1143–1148: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC221287/pdf/pnas00240-0135.pdf
and
Cohen, Paul J. (15 January 1964). "The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis, [part II]". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 51 (1): 105–110: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC300611/pdf/pnas00175-0117.pdf
Prove or disprove:
And why would that be hard? Because it is undecidable (can’t be proved or disproved) as shown in 1963 by Paul Cohen:
Cohen, Paul J. (15 December 1963). "The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis, [part I]". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 50 (6): 1143–1148: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC221287/pdf/pnas00240-0135.pdf
and
Cohen, Paul J. (15 January 1964). "The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis, [part II]". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 51 (1): 105–110: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC300611/pdf/pnas00175-0117.pdf
Last edited: