enter~space~cap
{Enter-Space-Capsule}
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2003
- Messages
- 153
Hey guys just need a help here trying to come to terms with the historiography behind albert speer:
Im perfectly aware that there exists the debate between whether Albert Speer is a penitent nazi or a failed penitent. What i dont understand is which historiography genres belong to these two groups.
Currently this is what i think:
Intentionalists ---> Speer's an amoral technocrat
Revisionist --> Speer is a lying bastard
Please enlighten me on whether this is correct or not.
Im perfectly aware that there exists the debate between whether Albert Speer is a penitent nazi or a failed penitent. What i dont understand is which historiography genres belong to these two groups.
Currently this is what i think:
Intentionalists ---> Speer's an amoral technocrat
Revisionist --> Speer is a lying bastard
Please enlighten me on whether this is correct or not.