Im not critising uni's, im critising the people that go there. I never said that non USYD students do not critise UWS too, i made an observation that its is primarily USYD students critising UWS.
I have never said also, that USYD is not th emost prestigious uni around, i agree wholeheartly that is is, im not denying that.
The definition you just provided can be manipulated. Just becuase it does not impress you, does not mean it does not impress others. Just becuase it doesent influence you, does not mean it cant influence others.
UWS and USYD are imcomparable as UWS was established in 1989, while USYD in the 1800's. I fyou can think you can compare these 2 uni's in terms of wealth and sucess, you cant. UWS has not had the time to establish a name for itself.
UWS has not had time to produce top graduates- if you are referring to academics who normally have to have a PHd- its only been open 15 years, most academics today got their PHd a long time before that.
Architecture- who bases a uni on arcitecture. Have you seen some of UWS's buildings. It may not be old, but some buildings have a distinct uniquiness, that is interesting to look at. Sure we dont have sandstone buildings, but then again, the uni was established in 1989, not 1800 and somehting.
If you are calling me not open minded then done. You are th eone who is not being open minded. You have made no effort to do your research, and you are only seeing what you chooose to see.
With being only established in 1989, UWS will too, serve future students, it will get better as a uni year by year.
I am only defending my uni becuase im sick of the bad mouthing about it. And as I said, I am not denying USYD is most prestigious, but its prtty sad for people like you who only care about a universities prestige, rather than the quality of education we as students will get regardless of what uni we go too.