who do you like beezly or howard (1 Viewer)

[mossup]

considering that ill NEVER EVER IN A TRILLION BILLION YEARS vote for Howard, Beazleys the man. But i still think Latham was the best

ditto..........

 

[Not-That-Bright]

I do not understand how someone could be so completely against the howard government!
The government & belief of howard AREN'T THAT FAR from the government & beliefs of Latham, Beazley, Hawk, Keating, Whitlam.....

If you think howard's government is EVIL,
If you think howard's government is always WRONG,
Then do NOT vote labor, greens or socialist alliance would be ur best bet.

 

[MoonlightSonata]

i was a supporter of liberal for always before. but i really like beazley, he has a really good moral stance, which actually doesnt quite stick with wat his party believes so go the christians.
even if he is on the wrong "wing" apparently.... he still has a lot of the same beliefs as wat ppl r supporting on the other wing

How does what he believes not stick with his party? What morals are you talking about?

 

[mossup]

i didn't hear howard say anything about lowering hec's....did you???????

 

[Not-That-Bright]

If all you care about is lowering hecs you've got tunnle vision.
Asquithian, are you claiming that labor has become regressive?

 

[mossup]

no i was merely pointing out the difference.

 

[Not-That-Bright]

Yes there are differences, but they're not fundamental to a point where you must see it as 'us against them'.

 

[MuffinMan]

howards been for 9 yrs and counting...
time for a government change ppls

 

[mossup]

howards been for 9 yrs and counting...
time for a government change ppls

my point exactly! i liked lathum cos he was fresh blood! Sleazy Beazly has been around too long too.

 

[Not-That-Bright]

Yes but if you're claiming that labor is now as right as fraiser, i think you're stating that some point along the line they've gone backwards. Not simply become more conservative.

 

[mossup]

*mossup steps to the left*

 

[leetom]

for example, if sociological findings that external factors are a major determinant of individual behaviour are so correct, then why haven't we as a society focused more heavily upon the stablilty of social structure, to prevent detrimental behaviours from occurring. On the other hand psychologists say it is purely individual and the workings of ones mind produce certain behaviours... i.e. behaviour at maquarie fields...

Here are two totally contrasiting academic opinions which haven't actually solved the problem. They've identified issues for sure, however have not been proactive in developing ways to solve them....and if they have the solutions aren't implemented on a large enough scale to affect society as a whole... Now your doing law asquinthian so I won't win the argument but at least you know part of my point...


I didnt say we shouldnt have them, nor did I say I knew more... I was merely stating that they have minimal life/practical experience which is often more beneficial than intellectualism....

BTW im primarily talking about academics in scoial sciences/literature....


And that is a huge problem... we have too many full time career politicians who have never worked a day in their life....

Just become a police officer and do what we say.

 

[leetom]

What's with this poll? a bunch of new howard supporters joined the forums or do the lefties of this forum possibly hate kim?

We won't vote when the name of our leader is spelt incorrectly.

 

[BrenKHS]

Howards annoys me: can anyone say "core" and "non-core" promises?

And I thought a promise was a promise. How stupid of me.

 

[mr EaZy]

Yeah. Sure.

I get worried with all these B police people who dont know the difference between their left and right.

maybe coz they're drunk !

 

[mr EaZy]

We won't vote when the name of our leader is spelt incorrectly.

your leader?
so your a LAbor fan are ya

well i am! BEAZLEY ROCKS!
i dunno what he did wrong the last time, but ever since he's got in, i've seen him make great arguments and criticisms of the Liberals in economics policies

 

[malkin86]

Do you even need to ask me?

*salutes* Mr Beazley, I've got ticker!


I think Howard is sort of stuck, he spends a lot of time talking to the media, but still he seems standoffish and, I dunno, not one of us. And I don't mean "unaustralian" or whatever, but perhaps not one of the common people.

The one time I saw him IRL, he was too busy to smile during a parade, too busy looking like a serious leader for the cameras on what should be a happy day for all... His wife could afford to smile and wave to the people below, but he couldn't?

 

[samuelblayden]

when you say Beezly...do you mean Beazley?

yea I do sorry

 

[Not-That-Bright]

Do you even need to ask me?

*salutes* Mr Beazley, I've got ticker!


I think Howard is sort of stuck, he spends a lot of time talking to the media, but still he seems standoffish and, I dunno, not one of us. And I don't mean "unaustralian" or whatever, but perhaps not one of the common people.

The one time I saw him IRL, he was too busy to smile during a parade, too busy looking like a serious leader for the cameras on what should be a happy day for all... His wife could afford to smile and wave to the people below, but he couldn't?

Malkin, i'm not voting for a 'friend', i'm voting for a leader.

 

[mr EaZy]

Beazley is a Rhodes scholar... need I say more... academics are inadequate to develop policy as they only pay attention to their useless studies which hold no practical usage... they've never worked a day in their life and try to find a politically correct explanation for every ill that exists in society...

dont rhodes scholars need to be good at sport?

well, not good but active, but oh well,
before i think about rhodes, i should get some work done