kkk579
hello
Please help, why is it so difficult compared to chemistry? Is it normal to be struggling this early one? Weird how some ppl find physics easier than chemistry, i just dont get how they think that
-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
Why is physics so hard (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter kkk579
- Start date
johnnnCENAAAA
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2023
- Messages
- 159
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2023
true story
which module is this? (or is it just mod 1-2?)
kkk579
hello
Yeah i havent even started mod2 yet and im already struggling with the harder questions on mod1
suvat, graphs or relative motion?
kkk579
hello
relative motion and suvat but relative motion mainly - for some qs i just sometimes have no clue where to start and the qs really confuse me
do you have any examples? personally i couldn't find any 'extension' relative motion qns besides "velo of a relative to b is ... –> velo of b relative to ground is ... hence find velo of a"
kkk579
hello
kkk579
hello
These would probably be of a normal
/medium difficulty but since im bad at physics theyre hard
first step(s): draw a diagram & convert all units to SI units (also is this peak LOL)
do u want me to do it and show working
kkk579
hello
If you could that would be good
is this y11 or 12?
kkk579
hello
11
kkk579
hello
Nah lol its not peak
i will give them a try but I know nothing abt physics
suvat qns can't really get that hardThese would probably be of a normal
/medium difficulty but since im bad at physics theyre hard
qn 1 (btw this is quite lengthy)
so first step as before:
draw diagram/convert to si units (ngl i just half drew a diagram so i don't think it'd help to see mine). if your tutor hasn't told you already, you can go from km/h –> m/s by dividing 3.6 and vice versa
the displacement between point a and b (ignoring the cars both moving for now) is 10 (distance between front of car and back of truck) + 20 (length of truck) + 10 (distance between final car rear & front of truck) + 4 (length of car) = 44m (i am using the front of the car as a reference point)
now you use the formula
so
so then you can plug that time value back into
kkk579
hello
Answer for that q is t=5s and distance is 144msuvat qns can't really get that hard
qn 1 (btw this is quite lengthy)
so first step as before:
draw diagram/convert to si units (ngl i just half drew a diagram so i don't think it'd help to see mine). if your tutor hasn't told you already, you can go from km/h –> m/s by dividing 3.6 and vice versa
the displacement between point a and b (ignoring the cars both moving for now) is 10 (distance between front of car and back of truck) + 20 (length of truck) + 10 (distance between final car rear & front of truck) + 4 (length of car) = 44m (i am using the front of the car as a reference point)
now you use the formula. you assume that the truck and the car have the same initial velocity (so might asw consider them as relative velo of 0)
so
so then you can plug that time value back into
yep then mine is correct they just rounded it
kkk579
hello
How to get good at physics
um tbh idk it's just weird ig just spam qns and know which assumptions to make/which assumptions are used that's the part a lot of people struggle with and if your tutor goes through it then you're fine