-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
The Official Football Thread 2005/2006 (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter copious
- Start date
- Status
Tender_Branson
Member
I think they need bolstering in all areas of the field. I've said it before and I'll say it again- this time last year, Moyes was odds on favourite (you actually can bet on this) to be the first manager sacked in the 04/05 season. It was a freak year for them, and I think they'll be stuggling to make the top half. They won't get past Villareal in the Champions League qualifiers and will be thoughourly destroyed by Man U first game of the season.copious said:
Italian Hotshot
Che?
I gotta agree with Benny_, Spurs have done well in keeping their young talent and adding Davids is a big coup for them. I still think Newcastle will struggle to stay in the top half despite signing Emre, Scott Parker and co. Even though their squad hasn't changed that much I think Charlton are a dark horse for a solid finish, top 6 at least.
matt#1
...
Does Manchester United really even need Michael Owen? We already have Van Nistelrooy, Rooney, Smith, Saha, Rossi and Ole Skolskjaer is close to full fitness. Ronaldo can also play upfront. Oh, and I forgot Bellion. 
We really need to sign a player like Ballack...not another striker.
We really need to sign a player like Ballack...not another striker.With Ole back fit I dont think they Fergie will go for Owen. Besides they dont have any problems scoring goals anyway. If anything they need a right winger and a mid.matt#1 said:Does Manchester United really even need Michael Owen? We already have Van Nistelrooy, Rooney, Smith, Saha, Rossi and Ole Skolskjaer is close to full fitness. Ronaldo can also play upfront. Oh, and I forgot Bellion.
Tender_Branson
Member
copious said:
*Cough* FA Cup final *Cough*
*Cough* 1-0 loss to West Brom with 30 shots on target *Cough*
I agree that Man U don't need any more than there $100 million strike force, but it didn't really work for them last season did it?
...
^___^
Tender_Branson said:
well neither did Drogba and Kezman who cost chelski around 30million pounds
matt#1
...
We already have a brilliant right winger. Or did you mean that we need someone to back up for Ronaldo when he is injured? We do need another midfielder though.copious said:
matt#1
...
Giggs has been running up and down Utd's left wing for 15 years...how could yopu not know that Ronaldo is a right winger?copious said:
He is very good with both feet though...so he can play on either side or even up front. Giigs and Ronaldo regularly switch positions throughout the game.
...
^___^
http://sports.yahoo.com/sow/news;_y...ericans_sports_feature&prov=reuters&type=lgns
what a lovely piece of article
omg, americans made it to the world cup for the 5th time, and the hardest team they have to beat would be mexico, and even if they lose, they would still qualify automatically provided they ar ranked 2nd in the group
gg, great argument by the yanks.."we are above the world champions and england"
name me a top ranked national team USA played in the past year?
Costa Rica?
what a lovely piece of article
omg, americans made it to the world cup for the 5th time, and the hardest team they have to beat would be mexico, and even if they lose, they would still qualify automatically provided they ar ranked 2nd in the group
gg, great argument by the yanks.."we are above the world champions and england"
name me a top ranked national team USA played in the past year?
Costa Rica?
lol no shit. However he isnt around forever, and the only two players i see who are grooming potential for that spot are richardson and ronaldo. Though if he's gonna stay on the right then Man utd need a holding mid. Then again, PArk Ji Sung can play on the left too.matt#1 said:Giggs has been running up and down Utd's left wing for 15 years...how could yopu not know that Ronaldo is a right winger?
matt#1
...
lol- typically arrogant Americans. Anyway...here is a list of the current top 20 national sides as ranked by FIFA:
1 Brazil
2 Argentina
3 Netherlands
4 Czech Republic
5 Mexico
6 USA
7 France
8 England
8 Spain
10 Portugal
11 Germany
12 Turkey
13 Japan
14 Italy
15 Iran
15 Republic of Ireland
17 Sweden
18 Uruguay
19 Denmark
19 Greece
...i can't believe that USA is ranked no.6 in the world. Mexico's 5th ranking and Japan's 11th ranking are also slightly surprising. Its good to see an Asian team so high up the rankings though. In my opinion England and Portugal are two of the best teams in the world and should both be ranked much higher. Australia is ranked no. 60 in the world.
1 Brazil
2 Argentina
3 Netherlands
4 Czech Republic
5 Mexico
6 USA
7 France
8 England
8 Spain
10 Portugal
11 Germany
12 Turkey
13 Japan
14 Italy
15 Iran
15 Republic of Ireland
17 Sweden
18 Uruguay
19 Denmark
19 Greece
...i can't believe that USA is ranked no.6 in the world. Mexico's 5th ranking and Japan's 11th ranking are also slightly surprising. Its good to see an Asian team so high up the rankings though. In my opinion England and Portugal are two of the best teams in the world and should both be ranked much higher. Australia is ranked no. 60 in the world
.matt#1
...
I think that Ronaldo will stay on the right. Park Ji Sung is being groomed for Giggs' left wing position and Smith is being groomed to takeover Keane's position when he retires.copious said:
HeCtic
Dutchie
rankings are based on results and you cant argue with the results then themselves. however i think that the basic complaint would be that teams are getting the points that give them such a lofty ranking by playing a large number of games against easy opposition. but i doubt anything will ever be done to resolve this issue as for most countries it would be economically and technically(timewise) impossible to play alot of other countries and so they stick to playing those near them, even if those countries are 2nd rate.
that said the rankings dont really suprise me. but it is still fairly obvious that despite the rankings england has a better chance of winning the world cup then usa and so on. this is because england regularly plays games against tougher opponents then the usa does....
man utd has replaced a number of brilliant players (who are gettign older or have left) with also rans to some extent, and the youth is yet to come through.
beckham, giggs, scholes, keane, butt, sheringham, yorke, cole, schmichael have been replaced by the likes of smith, djemba djemba, saha, ronaldo, richardson etc (all of whom and more have failed or are yet to forfill potential - and that is a big wrap on ronaldo so dont get offended. )
that said the rankings dont really suprise me. but it is still fairly obvious that despite the rankings england has a better chance of winning the world cup then usa and so on. this is because england regularly plays games against tougher opponents then the usa does....
man utd has replaced a number of brilliant players (who are gettign older or have left) with also rans to some extent, and the youth is yet to come through.
beckham, giggs, scholes, keane, butt, sheringham, yorke, cole, schmichael have been replaced by the likes of smith, djemba djemba, saha, ronaldo, richardson etc (all of whom and more have failed or are yet to forfill potential - and that is a big wrap on ronaldo so dont get offended. )
HeCtic
Dutchie
"Thierry" Bellion a flop?copious said:Dont forget David the Flop bellion
No way!!
niall045
Member
... said:
- Status