year 2100: China vs USA. (1 Viewer)

[BBJames]

.

 

[jb_nc]

year 2100, bbj 110 years old; still shitpostin

 

[Uncle]

Us in 2100.

USA will crash and burn from George Bush's accidentally the economy and remain in eternal deficit and China will see Communism as the only viable alternative.
It becomes the clash of the white and china gooks.

 

[JonathanM]

I support America in this war no matter who the greater strength is.

My logic:

American Porn Stars>Chinese Porn Stars

Any conflict with China, economic or military could have a detrimental effect on the American porn industry. This is a risk that cannot be taken. Whilst I am taking the best measures possible to stockpile for this conflict, there is no way I can truly get enough material together in time.

China must not become stronger. Boycott Chinese porn.

Wait, what?


...


But yeah, pretty sure there are other threads on this?

Ignoring that, what goes up must come down. China did not have much of a loss during the GFC compared to the other economies and I believe there will be a Chinese slump which will bare many of the flaws in the Chinese system. It will wreak havoc on the largely unregulated Chinese economy and will cause huge civil unrest (which is already starting to boil under the surface).

 

[Rasengan2dabalz]

If i ever wanted to go on some mass killing spree, which will result in my death, i would go to fucking China and kill as many as i could.
Dunno y china thou
Just sharing

 

[rokkuguhyo]

Neither.

We'll all be dead by then, because all natural resources which we rely on to survive will have run out.

Either that, or the terrorists will have killed us all.

 

[youngminii]

Year 2100: North Korea angers the world by testing nukes.
USA finally does something about it and invades.
China joins North Korean side.
South Korea joins USA (not that it means much).
World War III envelops.
The populous China emerge as the winner, mutated from the nuclear fallout.

 

[maryBRAHS]

what about india? LOL

 

[Uncle]

outsource to other united nation

 

[Smile_Time351]

Year 2100: North Korea angers the world by testing nukes.
USA finally does something about it and invades.
China joins North Korean side.
South Korea joins USA (not that it means much).
World War III envelops.
The populous China emerge as the winner, mutated from the nuclear fallout.

This post (hereafter referred to as "The text") pleases me, although not in the conventional sense. As such, I feel obligated to disect it part by part:-

Point One: North Korea has already angered the world through the testing of "nukes", and thus far, very little has been done, although Kim has received the "condemnation of the UN :rofl:.

Point Two: The USA have nothing to gain from invading such a third world shit hole.

Point Three: Given that the Chinese have expressed (implicitly) the creation of an Eastern Bloc, they are more likely to destroy the upstart state of North Korea.

Point Four: I assume you actually mean develops, but given the fallacy of your previous points, this is rather irrelevant

Point Five: Despite the mention of Mutating Fallout (or perhaps because of it) your final point makes the most sense. China is populous. China will win. Anyone who voted otherwise on the above poll should be tarred and feathered.

 

[Garygaz]

The ever looming question, who would win in an all out war between China and the US. Considering the US's allies and superior technology, I would say the US.

 

[BBJames]

The ever looming question, who would win in an all out war between China and the US. Considering the US's allies and superior technology, I would say the US.

year 2100 not 2009

 

[Garygaz]

year 2100 not 2009

Yes, yes. Though I predict China will stay as a sideline nation, not making enemies or strong allies. The US will still have its strong ties with other Western nations in 2100

 

[S.H.O.D.A.N.]

Because China is so populace it's actually an easier target in a war, assuming both sides have equivalent technology and expertise (Which China certainly doesn't at the moment).

 

[Venetiad]

superior technology

Like you'd know.

Both countries have probably got some crazy prototype war machines in development for tomorrow's war.

 

[Uncle]

Like you'd know.

Both countries have probably got some crazy prototype war machines in development for tomorrow's war.

Metal gear

and other weapons on futureweapons.

 

[Tangent]

By 2100 everything will probably be MADE IN CHINA, leaving no jobs for anyone else, so china will own the world and enslave everyone else (including themselves)

 

[Smile_Time351]

Because China is so populace it's actually an easier target in a war, assuming both sides have equivalent technology and expertise (Which China certainly doesn't at the moment).

For someone who has such an awesome looking avatar, I almost feel bad for taking a critical approach. But you have forced my hand.

First of all: China is populous due to its large populace, in a relatively intellectual topic as this one, you have an obligation to use correct grammar:burn:
But in all seriousness, the idea that China is at a disadvantage because of its large population is ludicrous. It is an economic powerhouse, and at a time where the western system is weakening. In the wake of the GFC, the West is permanently weakened, and can never quite come back from such a devastating blow. Thus, I may even be so bold as to change the title of this thread to year 2050: China vs USA.