largarithmic
Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2011
- Messages
- 195
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
they're basically my favourite parts of the coursecircle geo and now probability, how do you know my weaknesses......i vote hax!
they're basically my favourite parts of the coursecircle geo and now probability, how do you know my weaknesses......i vote hax!
its a cool question to think about. the answers really random anyway, its always 1/2 lolYeah, sure why not....there is no way im going to get that probability Q.
I think that mightve even been part in that question in our trial, but I can't remember at all whether it had 2 or 3 partsProceed from:
and the 2n+1 roots of![]()
and
So combining the answer is 2.
Now try this question, it's from my trial. It's pretty neat too.
is a polynomial of degree
with real coefficients, where
is an odd positive integer, satisfying:
for each of
.
(In other words,).
By considering the polynomial, find the leading coefficient of
and hence find
.
I can't remember if theres a part (i), but the answers to (ii) and (iii) are wrong. Just because a polynomial Q[x] has roots a,b,c,... doesn't mean Q[x] = (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)... .for the question from your trial are the answers
(i)0,1,2,...n
(ii)x(x-1)(x-2)....(x-n), so leading term A = 1
(iii)P(n+1) = [(n+1)/(n+2)][1+n!] ?
its a cool question to think about. the answers really random anyway, its always 1/2 lol
um try this, from q8 in my trial but its considerably easier than it looks I reckon
Factoriseinto quadratic factors with real coefficients, and hence prove that:
![]()
Yeah that's right. Try either the polynomial question or that neat probability thing on the page before, theyre both fantastic questions in my opinion
Didn't think to do auxilliary method (though that works nicely)...what I was thinking was basically from the substitution you get:What Trebla said and in addition Put cos theta + sin theta in the form R cos alpha and then using the symmtery property (ie. integral from 0 to a f(x) = integral from 0 to a f(a-x)) and then use log laws.
Btw, where did you get that question from?
Did u do ur HSC last year?its a cool question to think about. the answers really random anyway, its always 1/2 lol
um try this, from q8 in my trial but its considerably easier than it looks I reckon
Factoriseinto quadratic factors with real coefficients, and hence prove that:
![]()
Thats how my teacher did it. I dont really like it that much coz its a bit random, like theres no clear motivation to go from line 1 to line 2 other than guesswork. If you do auxiliary angles, you can sorta metagame the question the whole way through.Didn't think to do auxilliary method (though that works nicely)...what I was thinking was basically from the substitution you get:
![]()
This is a very nice probability questionAnyway try this really nice probability question.
Alice and Bob take turns flipping a coin. Alice flips the coin N+1 times, and Bob flips it N times, where N is a positive integer. Alice 'wins' if she gets strictly more heads than Bob does. (e.g. if N=5 and Alice gets 4 heads 2 tails, while Bob gets 3 heads 2 tails, Alice wins; whereas if Bob got 4 heads 1 tail, she doesnt; and if he got all heads, he doesn't). Find the probability that Alice wins (in terms of N if necessary).
Yep thats correct ^^ It's a kinda nice result, there are lots of nice problems out there with similar methods. For a muuuuch harder and more abstract thing a bit like it, if you feel like trying it, try (but I really meant it with much harderr):
Yeah thats rightThis is a very nice probability question
Replace heads with tails and Alice winning to Alice losing, then the answer becomes obvious by symmetry. (i.e. for Alice to lose, she needs to flip strictly more tails than Bob does and P(Alice lose)=P(Alice wins) by symmetry).
Interestingly I guess I got something pretty differentThe solution is fairly similar, except two transformations were required for this one. Don't really have time to write down a complete solution but the end result is:
Some clever manipulations with binomial coefficients could probably put it in a nicer form.
Oh I realised I got my method wrong, I defined Q incorrectlyAs a test of solutions, when n=1, we are forced to have a_1=2. So F(2)=2/5. I think your expression comes out as 1/5 at 1. Your method sounds reasonable though, so im not really sure why somethings going wrong.