If we get binomial in Q6 or Q7 (1 Viewer)

[sinsolja]

like we did in 09, im screwed.

 

[aphorae]

I would be so fucking happy.

Screwed for random complicated projectiles though.

 

[workshops]

Lol it would be gg no re

 

[Omnipotence]

I reckon it's time that greatest co-efficients/term is re-introduced. Hasn't been in >2001 papers.

 

[sinsolja]

thats fine that wouldn't be Q6 or 7 standard. However comparing coefficients and what not really throws me off.

 

[taeyang]

Anyone else feel like they are fucked in the ass right about now? I thought I was ready but NUH UHH... if we got a probability question I am gone.

 

[rawrence]

I reckon it's time that greatest co-efficients/term is re-introduced. Hasn't been in >2001 papers.

I agree. And to look back at other stuff like english mandating a prescribed, extension 2 doing a conical pendulum against a surface, could be likely.

 

[UnrealAnchovies]

i have a feeling this paper will have a 3d trig question/ money problem

hopeful for full projectile motion/inverse functions question 7

 

[qawe]

I reckon it's time that greatest co-efficients/term is re-introduced. Hasn't been in >2001 papers.

it hasn't been there since the 1986 (I think). this is likely bcoz it is time consuming and repetitive, as well as the fact that some ppl consider T(0) - (cambridge) to be first term, and some ppl consider T(1) to be - (?MIF?)
this results in different expressions for T(k+1)/T(k)