cssftw
Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2009
- Messages
- 207
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
Here was my working out:
![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white A(x)=2\pi rh\\\\r=1-x\\\\h=y\\\\\therefore h=\frac{x}{1+x^2}\\\\\therefore A(x)=2\pi (1-x)(\frac{x}{1+x^2})\\\\\therefore \Delta V=2\pi(\frac{x}{1+x^2}-\frac{x^2}{1+x^2}).\: \Delta x\\\\\therefore V=\lim_{\Delta x \to 0}\sum_{x=0}^{1}2\pi(\frac{x}{1+x^2}-\frac{x^2}{1+x^2}).\Delta x\\\\\therefore V=2\pi\int_{0}^{1}\frac{x}{1+x^2}-\frac{x^2}{1+x^2}\: dx\\\\\therefore V=2\pi[\frac{1}{2}\ln (1+x^2) -x+\tan^{-1}x]\;0<x<1\\\\\therefore V=2\pi(\frac{1}{2}\ln (2) - 1 + \frac{\pi}{4})\;\;\; \; units^3)
I know it seems like a lot of working out but I'm pretty sure in the exam, I skipped a few steps and it was like 5-6 lines of working out total --> Is this enough to get 4/4? 4/4 was a lot of marks for a volumes question....
also I heard some people did some crap like include + (delta(x)) as part of their radius which is the CAMBRIDGE method, and apparently the theoretically correct method. I suppose my method is the cheap easy fast way.
Would I get full marks for this tho? THanks appreciate the help.
I know it seems like a lot of working out but I'm pretty sure in the exam, I skipped a few steps and it was like 5-6 lines of working out total --> Is this enough to get 4/4? 4/4 was a lot of marks for a volumes question....
also I heard some people did some crap like include + (delta(x)) as part of their radius which is the CAMBRIDGE method, and apparently the theoretically correct method. I suppose my method is the cheap easy fast way.
Would I get full marks for this tho? THanks appreciate the help.