Section II - Short Answer (1 Viewer)

freeeeee

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2011
Messages
282
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
^ Absolutely untrue, what is formula for calculating underlying? How do you know which goods will undergo excess price volatility lol? Can you predict that a cyclone is going to spike up the price of Bananas? I am pretty sure you dont need to haha =D, i could be wrong though but thats my opinion
 

inJust

Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
697
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Haha same dude, i just bull shitted that headline is more volatile than underlying. which is 1 out of 2 marks so im alrite with that :D
I WASN'T THE ONLY ONE HAHAH. I said it was volatile but I said doesn't take into account "imported goods" cos they're also volatile... BS'd it. Hope I get 1/2
 

Rawf

Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
715
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Ahh I thought so. my internal exams don't have half marks either. But I saw like James ruse has it in maths o_o I guess that's to distinguish their students better.

However, I'm pretty mad I lost 2 marks in this 2u maths exam... I shouldve gotten a cfm but they didn't give it to me..
It was like find the solutions for 2cosx=1 for the domain blabla
However... I thought at the time the working angle was Pi/6 (stupid mistake). so then my final 2 answers were wrong.. but it was simply because I used the wrong angle :( but the steps were all correct. 0 marks! (They allocated the 2 marks to the 2 final answers)
 

osak23

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
97
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
what was the question for underemployment??

it ask if decreased underemployment will affect the u/e rate??

i think wrote since underemployed is already calculated in unemployment...
changes in the underemployment >>i.e increased people working for more desired hours will not affect the unemployment rate, because its originally counted!!!!

amirite?????
i did it rly quickly..should of thought of it more if wrong..
 

Rawf

Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
715
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
what was the question for underemployment??

it ask if decreased underemployment will affect the u/e rate??

i think wrote since underemployed is already calculated in unemployment...
changes in the underemployment >>i.e increased people working for more desired hours will not affect the unemployment rate, because its originally counted!!!!

amirite?????
i did it rly quickly..should of thought of it more if wrong..
Erm. People who are underemployed aren't unemployed... they're counted as employed.
 

osak23

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
97
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
nah woops

i meant
since u/e %=u/e over LF

**
the labour force number would not change because those underemployed even if underemployment decreased will still be counted as employed..
so therefore u/e wont change??
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top