lol that is not rly a correct generalisationProbably a fair amount. Generally those who do well in mathematics and sciences are horrible in English and those who do well in history, geography, art are better in English. So I'm guessing it would be equally balanced.
I don't know, just something I have personally come to the conclusion of. Some people say the same but obviously we could be wrong.lol that is not rly a correct generalisation
That's a poor generalisation. So where do you categorise those who do Std English and Gen Maths? Or those who do 4U English and 4U Maths? Or those who mix humanities, science and maths? There's heaps of students who do those combinations, and do well on the whole, so it may be what you have observed, but it's definitely not accurate of the state.Probably a fair amount. Generally those who do well in mathematics and sciences are horrible in English and those who do well in history, geography, art are better in English. So I'm guessing it would be equally balanced.
Considering the scaling of subjects is based on English results, and MX1/MX2/physics/chemistry are the best in scaling, I'd say this definitely isn't true.Probably a fair amount. Generally those who do well in mathematics and sciences are horrible in English and those who do well in history, geography, art are better in English. So I'm guessing it would be equally balanced.
I think you'll find that a high majority of advanced students are doing advanced for the sake of their ATAR, and would drop english straight away if given the chance. I reckon it would be the 3/4U kids + a couple from advanced who have an interest in the arts.I think most of the advanced students will