HSC 2015 MX2 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

I understand what you're trying to say, but I don't understand how you intended to use the double derivative to acquire what you want to acquire.

Also, the turning points don't have to be under the x axis in order for the poly to have a maximal value less than 1. What if the function values were say 0.7, 0.5, 0.3 etc?
By proving that f"(x) has stationary points above or below the axis this shows thst there is only one root. If there is only one root in f"(x) then there is only one turning point in f'(x)
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Newton's method (as taught in HS) definitely isn't good enough to prove inequalities like the one Sy123 posted without additional work.

You are not taught any criteria by to check whether the resulting sequence does indeed converge to an exact root for given seed values , nor do you have any quantitative estimate for how large the error is between the n-th approximate root and the exact root.

You need these things to make such a proof attempt rigorous.
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Newton's method (as taught in HS) definitely isn't good enough to prove inequalities like the one Sy123 posted without additional work.

You are not taught any criteria by to check whether the resulting sequence does indeed converge to an exact root for given seed values , nor do you have any quantitative estimate for how large the error is between the n-th approximate root and the exact root.

You need these things to make such a proof attempt rigorous.
Looking at DrSoccer's posts in here, I doubt this would have been understood.

I tried stepping down a level and countering their 'proof' conceptually, but even that seemed to be too much.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Looking at DrSoccer's posts in here, I doubt this would have been understood.

I tried stepping down a level and countering their 'proof' conceptually, but even that seemed to be too much.
What does converge mean o_O
 

turntaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
3,908
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Integral of SecX DX using two methods
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Can someone integrate

And explain why the answer isnt

 
Joined
Mar 13, 2015
Messages
100
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Can someone integrate

And explain why the answer isnt

It is correct. But notice there is a +c. Sin^(-1)(x/4) and cos^(-1)(x/4) differ by pi/2.
to prove this: d/dx sin^(-1)(x/4) + cos^(-1)(x/4)
= 0 (cbb typing the differentation step)
siince it equals zero and if two functions equal you can integrate.
Int d/dx sin^(-1)(x/4) + cos^(-1)(x/4) = int 0 dx
therefore, sin^(-1)(x/4) + cos^(-1)(x/4) = D where D is a constant
now you can sub any number as they are congruent. Sub x = 4 you get D = pi/2.
Therefore they differ by pi/2 and therefore your answer is still correct
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top