HSC 2016 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

what substitution did you use for the second line
Border flip

i.e.
Definite integral rule that f(x)dx = f(a-x)dx

Note complementary angle identities
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Where's my mistake D:
Not necessarily any mistake, try showing your answer differs from mine and Paradoxica's by a constant, which it looks like it does from a glance. Otherwise, you may have just made a silly mistake in arithmetic.

Edit: yeah, your answer simplifies to ours quickly by using log. laws. Convert the 1 + tan2 x to sec2 x and use log. laws.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Not necessarily any mistake, try showing your answer differs from mine and Paradoxica's by a constant, which it looks like it does from a glance. Otherwise, you may have just made a silly mistake in arithmetic.
I like Paradoxica's method
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

I got that he used that substitution from the fact of complementary angles
I was just trying to think where the limits came from. Ah I see I forget to account for the dx as well which comes out negative which flips the limits back to what they are originally.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top