Pls help (1 Viewer)

ExtremelyBoredUser

Bored Uni Student
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
2,478
Location
m
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
Could you give the whole question? This seems like it requires prior context to do since in theory a regular parabola within a certain domain for k would suffice?
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The only way for a parabola to touch but not cross a circle is if the two have common tangents at each of the points of intersection, and thus a double root where the curves meet. So, the question is asking for such that , a quartic, has two double roots.
 

Lith_30

o_o
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
158
Location
somewhere
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
Uni Grad
2025
First we have to solve the two equations simultaneously so that the zeros of that equation are the points of intersection.



Sub into



Since the two graphs touch each other at two points, there will be two double roots which we'll label as

Sum of roots:


Sum of product of pairs:


Product of roots:


From we get , sub that into



Sub and into





To find the value of k we can just sub alpha and beta into



Now to find the points at which the graph touch each other we just sub the values of alpha and beta into the original equation.





Therefore points of contact are and
 

=)(=

Active Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2021
Messages
647
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Thank you so much

I have another question
1633056995277.png
 

jimmysmith560

Le Phénix Trilingue
Moderator
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
4,592
Location
Krak des Chevaliers
Gender
Male
HSC
2019
Uni Grad
2022
Thank you so much

I have another question
View attachment 32381
An identical question (with a couple of different values) was previously asked. It was as follows:

Two roots of are equal and rational. Find m.

The working out for this question is included below:

1633057699268.png
1633057719522.png

You should use this as guidance to solve your question (i.e. using the appropriate values from your own question).

Important edit:

As @CM_Tutor kindly pointed out, the working out attached should actually say to look at the roots of 14, which are
, and not the roots of 34. Further, the roots of 34 are incorrectly stated, as they should be
. Apologies for the typos!

I hope this helps! :D
 
Last edited:

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
First we have to solve the two equations simultaneously so that the zeros of that equation are the points of intersection.



Sub into

I suspect it is more efficient to recognise this as a quadratic in and solve it directly as:


Now, if there is a solution to this equation with then we have complex roots and hence there aren't two double roots. If there are two roots with then we have four roots and thus no double roots. So, we need there to be exactly one value of x^2 and it can't be zero (draw a sketch to see why). For there only to be a single value of , we require:








Perhaps more elegantly, examining , we can see that it must factorise as . This further factorises, provided , as , and seen that it can only give two double roots if , and so note that .
 

jimmysmith560

Le Phénix Trilingue
Moderator
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
4,592
Location
Krak des Chevaliers
Gender
Male
HSC
2019
Uni Grad
2022
The attachment should actually say to look at the roots of 14, which are , and not the roots of 34. Further, the roots of 34 are incorrectly stated, as they should be . Likely a couple of typos here.
Thank you for pointing this out! I have adjusted my post to reflect this :)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top