MedVision ad

sigma notation (1 Viewer)

user18181818

Active Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2023
Messages
231
Gender
Female
HSC
2023
can someone please show me how to do (ii) without expanding, using sigma notation?

1696394043485.png
 

cossine

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Messages
628
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
can someone please show me how to do (ii) without expanding, using sigma notation?

View attachment 40189
So you have been told to do (ii) using mathematical induction. Sigma notation is part of the question. I don't understand what trouble you are having please attempt the question first.
 

user18181818

Active Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2023
Messages
231
Gender
Female
HSC
2023
So you have been told to do (ii) using mathematical induction. Sigma notation is part of the question. I don't understand what trouble you are having please attempt the question first.
i got to the third RTP step where i said:
1696395637605.png
from there i know i have to split LHS to use the assumption of:
1696395702072.png
but i'm not sure how
 

cossine

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Messages
628
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
i got to the third RTP step where i said:
View attachment 40192
from there i know i have to split LHS to use the assumption of:
View attachment 40193
but i'm not sure how
Assume true for n = k

=> sigma(j=3 -> k) (j-1)C2 = kC3

Required to prove
=> sigma(j=3->k+1) (j-1)C2 = (k+1)C3

Your notation is off. Basically n is the total number of terms and j variable is used for indexing. However you seem to have replace j with k.

Using the assumption we get

sigma(j=3->k) (j-1)C2 + kC2

= kC3 +kC2

= kC2 + KC3 (Not necessary step just rearranging)

= (k+1)C3 using part i
 

user18181818

Active Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2023
Messages
231
Gender
Female
HSC
2023
i have another question, i'm not sure how to prove (i) as all i know is that they're parallel (gradients are same). i also have no idea what (ii) is saying
1696397505652.png
 

user18181818

Active Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2023
Messages
231
Gender
Female
HSC
2023
(ii) We have the line . So the gradient of the line is . Now if we look at the vector treating as being in the positive directions respectively, then its gradient is rise/run, or which is the same gradient as the line. Therefore, it overlaps with the line.

(ii)



But is on the line , therefore . Substituting back in, we get


as required.
thanks!!
 

SB257426

Very Important User
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
309
Location
Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
(ii) We have the line . So the gradient of the line is . Now if we look at the vector treating as being in the positive directions respectively, then its gradient is rise/run, or which is the same gradient as the line. Therefore, it overlaps with the line.

(ii)



But is on the line , therefore . Substituting back in, we get


as required.
Damn nice lol... much better than the way I did it
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top