user18181818
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2023
- Messages
- 228
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2023
So you have been told to do (ii) using mathematical induction. Sigma notation is part of the question. I don't understand what trouble you are having please attempt the question first.can someone please show me how to do (ii) without expanding, using sigma notation?
View attachment 40189
i got to the third RTP step where i said:So you have been told to do (ii) using mathematical induction. Sigma notation is part of the question. I don't understand what trouble you are having please attempt the question first.
Assume true for n = ki got to the third RTP step where i said:
View attachment 40192
from there i know i have to split LHS to use the assumption of:
View attachment 40193
but i'm not sure how
Basically for question what is being used iscan someone please show me how to do (ii) without expanding, using sigma notation?
View attachment 40189
no worries !!! always happy to helpcheers guys!
thanks!!(ii) We have the line . So the gradient of the line is . Now if we look at the vector treating as being in the positive directions respectively, then its gradient is rise/run, or which is the same gradient as the line. Therefore, it overlaps with the line.
(ii)
But is on the line , therefore . Substituting back in, we get
as required.
Damn nice lol... much better than the way I did it(ii) We have the line . So the gradient of the line is . Now if we look at the vector treating as being in the positive directions respectively, then its gradient is rise/run, or which is the same gradient as the line. Therefore, it overlaps with the line.
(ii)
But is on the line , therefore . Substituting back in, we get
as required.