Predictions for Modern? (9 Viewers)

[tikkamassalawarrior]

Correct me if I am wrong but something similar did happen to paper 2 English advanced this year? I wonder how it got leaked.

it never got leaked? tf are u talking about

 

[pilot_djeddie]

it never got leaked? tf are u talking about

Oh was it not? I thought it was on a Facebook HSC page because prior to the exam, there was lots of chatter about a full 20 mark discursive and the essay questions not word for word but a general sense on what it was asking

 

[tikkamassalawarrior]

Oh was it not? I thought it was on a Facebook HSC page because prior to the exam, there was lots of chatter about a full 20 mark discursive and the essay questions not word for word but a general sense on what it was asking

bruh its just called a prediction, it's not even possible for the HSC to be leaked, literally only 4 people know the Q's in advance they all sign NDAs that shit is never getting leaked

 

[pilot_djeddie]

bruh its just called a prediction, it's not even possible for the HSC to be leaked, literally only 4 people know the Q's in advance they all sign NDAs that shit is never getting leaked

Oh sorry. I was told it got leaked by at least 10 people.

 

[pilot_djeddie]

You must forgive my lack of awareness on the internet

 

[tikkamassalawarrior]

Oh sorry. I was told it got leaked by at least 10 people.

yeah dont trust these niggas

 

[tikkamassalawarrior]

now i await the redacted version on nesa website, and no, it will have nothing to do with copyright!

tywebb i think my older brother is taught by you

 

[tiredxoxo]

for crm, did u guys talk about other countries for the 12 marker

i had a rushed 2 sentence mention of australia and charles perkins but apart from that, no

 

[tiredxoxo]

they deny it gave advantage. i think rest of universe may disagree

and the way webb is vehemently denying that it gave any advantage to those who did have it in their trials. sure it probs didnt have THAT much of an impact but im just pissed bc i didnt get it in my trials LOL.

anyways, boycotting ken webb

 

[la_sportive]

Honestly if you said "changed thoroughly" and "transformed" about 50 times you'll be fine lmao

FR THO

 

[beanbug]

For China 1927-1949, I did question B regarding Communist victory because, I ain't comparing CCP vs GMD approaches. I can do it but I feel like it would make my essays a little bit convoluted. For Conflict in Europe, I did question A (escalation of conflict post 1935). And then I do Civil Rights . I was worried that a 2021 but slightly harder would occur but honestly, this was a 2022 reincarnation.

Power and authority was weird. Not in a baaaadd way but i felt that the questions were just... I can't find the right words.

the communist victory question was a bit unexpected imo but i agree i did not feel like doing an essay on the approaches ahaha. p&a was so weird i agree. i hadn't seen a comparison question about the value of the sources before and the 15 marker? huh.

 

[weeze]

haven't got whole paper, but i have this
View attachment 45292

bro im like 99% sure this was in my trial, i was so shocked to open the paper and see it
(in my opinion, i think it gave a little bit of an advantage tbh because i had teachers feedback from my response on analysing that source + my brain automatically knew what to respond with- but i didn't utilise that advantage since i didn't read over my power and authority feedback from trials gg)

anyways does anyone think this year will have cracked alignment or nah cuz i feel like a lot of the questions were really difficult and weird i might just be coping cause i worked really hard all year for modern history just to be done dirty by the goofiest conflict in Europe and russia questions like why did they ask about the survey in CIE and repeat foreign policy from last year???

 

[beanbug]

bro im like 99% sure this was in my trial, i was so shocked to open the paper and see it
(in my opinion, i think it gave a little bit of an advantage tbh because i had teachers feedback from my response on analysing that source + my brain automatically knew what to respond with- but i didn't utilise that advantage since i didn't read over my power and authority feedback from trials gg)

anyways does anyone think this year will have cracked alignment or nah cuz i feel like a lot of the questions were really difficult and weird i might just be coping cause i worked really hard all year for modern history just to be done dirty by the goofiest conflict in Europe and russia questions like why did they ask about the survey in CIE and repeat foreign policy from last year???

alignment this year could honestly go either way. the questions were really easy for my essay sections but ive heard that they were a bit all over the place for other people esp for conflict in europe. i think the core section's questions were a bit weird and that 15 marker might have a big impact. i hope its good alignment tho...

 

[Solarised]

alignment this year could honestly go either way. the questions were really easy for my essay sections but ive heard that they were a bit all over the place for other people esp for conflict in europe. i think the core section's questions were a bit weird and that 15 marker might have a big impact. i hope its good alignment tho...

more like we would have midline alignment, probably along the lines of 83-84 scaling to a low b6

 

[beanbug]

more like we would have midline alignment, probably along the lines of 83-84 scaling to a low b6

yeah its possible. im gonna try and avoid thinking about it until i get my marks back

 

[L. Mandrake]

and the way webb is vehemently denying that it gave any advantage to those who did have it in their trials. sure it probs didnt have THAT much of an impact but im just pissed bc i didnt get it in my trials LOL.

anyways, boycotting ken webb

Yeah, cancel Kenny Webb for this lol. He deserves it...

 

[Solarised]

yeah its possible. im gonna try and avoid thinking about it until i get my marks back

Yeah I already zoned out of marks and stuff, I just saw this thread was a lil active and decided to hop back in

 

[L. Mandrake]

Clearer version perhaps...

 

[beanbug]

Yeah, cancel Kenny Webb for this lol. He deserves it...

noo my king he actually carried me through year 12

 

[literallydomfike]

hey, for anyone who did crm, question abt the 8: i'm a bit worried bc i did montgomery projected king to success and spread nvda, march forced federal attention leading to act (64) and was quite hard on the mlk achieved success - totally spaced and had no mention of 'against' reasons. would this bring me down? i checked nesa glossary and it says discuss is "identify issues and provide reasons for and/OR against" but still a bit worried..does anyone have more experience with these questions?