no way omg is this accuratethat not that bad, math is hard, I'm gonna fumble biz and bio, hopefully get like raw above 70 in legal, but prob not ,
I do have hope fo scaling tho, cause according to
HSC Raw Marks Database
for bio in 2022 a 53 are mark aligned to a 71
and for biz in 2022 a 68alinged to a 80
and in 2021 a 66 alinged to a 80, so both years that's a band 5
alignment changes every year so it wont be super accurate, but the stuff reported is verified by the sites owners so it is kinda the best you have for estimating your aligned mark
Nah your mark probably won’t decrease, but the band cutoffs will just be higher, so you need like 70%+ to get e4, 60%+ to get e3, etc, whereas harder years might have lower cutoffs. These are not my predictions for the cutoffs btw it was just an example
not bad I think but my answer to question 3 was a bit shit and the essay was hella rushed
hbu
same, but i hated question 2 more it was so weirdnot bad I think but my answer to question 3 was a bit shit and the essay was hella rushed
true, tbh the only part I'm confident in is the 5 marker lol
It was kind of a boring exam imo... the essay questions weren't particularly inspiring and the 12 marker didn't know what it was. I was hoping for architecture or a sculpture
I disliked Q3 cause I didn’t really know what to talk bout. It was obv a conceptual framework question, but beyond the works having food and drink as social gathering traditions in all cultures, I didn’t know what to exactly point out (except for plate 7’s Invitation)
I feel like I knew my stuff for the essay but my time management wasn't great and I am not confident in q3
Tbh? It was doable but it felt like they deliberately tried to scale up the difficulty, so hopefully that’ll reflect in the marks. It wasn’t too hard, just like annoying to have to run out of things to say for Q3. Question 2 was really fun tho
same architecture would've been awesome I was so prepped
Q2 was actually the best question of the entire exam. It wasn't a like... hard exam but you can tell they did try to make it harder this yr. There wasn't a great amount I could say for q3 tbh
I kinda liked q2 tbh, it was asking about his future practice through his medium more than a structural analysis. So I talked about his use of installation and video which united both Aboriginal culture and contemporary Australian identity, and how the video pretty much allowed him to ‘create’ the artwork in front of live audiences at the gallery
Architecture is actually interesting bc you can talk about interactions with the public and the immediate environment. The yap goes crazy
Yes same. I pointed out how plate 7, ‘An Invitation’ was the most different as it is a contemporary work that used satire to challenge the traditional expectations of women which aimed to make dining spaces inviting for men. But the chaos of it all with the animals and their unfriendly expressions demonstrated a subversion of works like the other plates, which is kind of a glorified view showing the respective beauty of their cultures
damn, I did not have enough time to say anything near as in depth. kinda worried lol
