Search results

Bugger. Oh well at least if someone else got it that means we followed some sort of logic haha

Hopefully 90 or above. I'd be surprised if less than 85. I think I only got one or two multiple choice wrong max, my short answers were pretty solid and so it depends how I go with the extended responses. Although for trials I got 81 with the same logic because I ended up getting 16 for...

Re: Finished! Congrats! I'm done in six days, 5 exams down and 3 to go.

Haha crap I want one, wasn't even offered. Would be awesome to make them pay like 10 to 15 dollars to ship it over here. Plus a yoyo, woo! Do they actually want us to study?

Good point. The only thing is how are we supposed to know exactly how much the value would change? Not a fair question if we're supposed to take that into account. The syllabus only says we need to know the effect on a K value of a change in temperature, which is that it gets higher or lower...

I wish now that I had BSd more on that answer. I wrote that it was amphiprotic but honestly had no idea whether it was or not. I probably could have come up with something about why it's useful. Ah well.

Same. I got something like 72000 :(

Re: Did anyone watched Summer Heights High? you can download it off the website, only took me 5-10 minutes. Might be a bit longer if more people are getting it. lol Barker College, I know people there. I thought he was from Melbourne or something.

I had absolutely no idea about the NaHCO3 question, I didn't remember learning about it at all. I did say that it was amphiprotic though which was a total guess but yay +1 mark :)

I put filtration because in the diagram it had them both going to a box marked filter and I had nfi how it worked, lol. Hopefully I manage one mark considering it was a two mark question.

Yeah I got 1.333... That seems to be the general consensus so you should feel pretty safe.

Yeah that's what I got too.

Impure alkanols is also a valid reason. I can't think of any besides those two.

Ditto.

Re: Did anyone watched Summer Heights High? Pat was the weakest character imo, but the little things made it funny. Like having a scale model using a doll to test rolling techniques. Phil Olivetti was just such an asshole to his kids that it was awesome. He was halfway between David Brent and...

Re: Did anyone watched Summer Heights High? WCBH is awesome tbh I don't understand how you can find one funny and not the other.

What do you mean?

?

Nah but I just had it written down in my notes that Carbon-11 was produced by bombarding Boron-10 with protons. So I mixed up the number in my exam. I didn't actually write how it was produced.

I did Strontium-90 and Carbon-11 Except now I'm really paranoid that I wrote Carbon-10 by mistake, which I think did. Damn it why did I have to know how it was produced? That actually screwed me. Hopefully that mistake won't affect my mark too much, depends if the markers feel like being...