Search results

Son of a bitch *PISSING Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Haha bro this iPads autocorrect is posing me off so much Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I was going to say, they must have taken the wrong definition and thought they sounded smart by trying to trick people. But I guess they can do that because the term 'sum to infinity' was never defined last year, so I would have treated it as a limiting sum nevertheless, even though its...

Hmmm ok I get it, so an infinite sum by definition can converge and diverge.

?

Isn't that an infinite series?

How is solving for that going to determine the value for which it is NOT an infinite sum?

A limiting sum isn't an infinite sum. A limiting sum is a sum with infinite terms, however the sum of those terms is not infinity. An infinite sum means the sum of the terms is infinite, it doesn't imply it has infinite terms (it DOES have infinite terms, but the name 'infinite sum' isn't so...

I smell Omed

Hmmmm ok thanks

I've heard things about the 2001 too so I think that's what you're talking about.

But if his contribution was essentially an extension from plancks hypothesis, then how does it support it? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

If you're really unsure where to start, grab a past paper, and do an open book exam.

Anyone ready for tomorrow? Any questions while revising that someone may help you with?

Who knows maybe they'll copy paste some bos trial questions next year.

I had a quick geez the last question and it looked quite interesting.

>says she won't speak about the last question >speaks about last question

Yeh you should, it's only fair

Ah fine my thread dies :( From 2009 q7(b)

please don't waste your time worrying about me when results come out You have a gf man