Search results

That because there was no working involved in that question, it was reading off a graph If you state the correct answer, with no working then that is normally considered to be proof of correct substitution and marked correct. If you subst correctly and then make a calculator error you will...

Don't worry it will still be read and marked.

A table structure will definetly be in the marking scheme. I doubt if you would obtain more than half marks if it isn't in a table format.

Can anyone remember the exact wording of the question? The structure of the table is going to be important. Also, how did it say transfer and transformation. I can't remember

At the moment I am guessing but I would say there will have to be an Australian relationship to it. It also will have to be specific applications of transistors in communications. Eg. Reduce staffing, lengthen ability to send long distance calls etc.

He expanded on the Bohr model, so the electrons were no longer particles orbitting but standing waves.

Are you talking about above or below threshold frequency?

You don't really need to know the definition of both but you do need to realise to obtain a greater contrast, you want a larger difference between the two. T1 is the longitudional relaxation time, that is to go back to their natural line up with magnetic fields. T2 is the transverse relaxation...

Conservation of momentum etc

That must also depend on the subject. In the sciences, there is no marks placed on any paper, no matter how many pages the answer is.

Go the next step. Eg Keyhole, surgery requires less recovery time and this means society benefits due to less work hours lost due to surgery etc....

No they don't put a mark on the paper at all.

You might want to check facts. Eg in the top 5 companies in Australia it is a balance of economics and science

The strucutre and the outline is there. What detail do you want? By doing two, you aren't specifically marked down but you have penalised yourself, by not spending the time on the one. This means you probably haven't gone into the detail they are after. They are proof read by previous...

No every subject is scaled against every other subject based on who does what combination. There isn't a single reference.

I remember that change, I think that was removed in the HSC. I am trying to remember back to the pre-Metheral reforms that brought in the English compulsory in legislation. So looking at the early Wyndham years of the 60s through to 1989. Time goes too fast.

Looking for a source to quote but it was compulsory to complete but not compulsory for your UAI. I'm not sure if the change was for the NEW HSC or just before,

Not all members of the exam committee have taught the subject. In the sciences at least it is normal to have an academic from a university on the committee. Often they end up being the head examiner.

That is wrong. It does help but it isn't required. Up until the 90s Maths was compulsory in the HSC

BOS has always stated the exams shouldn't be predictable in the whole. Some subjects seem to finally have taken notice of the message.