Search results

Could just be SAM doesn't do 100s?

Didn't like the essay questions much... but ok overall.

I did Alexander... thought the 'the Great' thing was bad, but I had gone over it, and then I realised it was just a chance to talk about what he did well and bad, so it was easy enough. Early career was annoying, so was non-Greeks, but I think there was enough crap to put in for each...

Society was ok... sparta shorter questions was good, filled the little book pages thing, what was with asking the same 2001 question about name 2 kings?! We had that in our trial though, and it bugged me coz I knew none, so I think I got them for that...

Did not like them at all... my worst bit, i only got 5 ish pages each...

You have to know the structure of citric acid, its somewhere in the syllabus... Its a lot easier to draw than to say...

I did maths ext 2 last year... I didnt do any of question 7, 2 marks in question 8, only got half of question 5 and missed bits and pieces everywhere else... I came out thinking I'd screwed up so much, i figured maximum mark if i got everything possible and they gave me some marks for working...

I think it's because they are private, but they include negligance, and that a criminal thing? I'm making up stuff, correct me if im wrong... Number 14 would be right to work, econmic isnt it? There's the other bit, but is that a legal right?

Sounds about right, the few that were different in mine i wasnt sure about... i put 12A (that one confused me...) 15D (i think i missed seeing international law, but isnt tort public and private?)

Consumers and family i both did B... I would have liked to do A, but then they'd mention one bit to talk about that i was like... no thanks! normally theres one general and one more specific, they were pretty specificfor both this year... The bit for part B where it was groups in society, not...

Is there a way to complain? I know for like chem you can get some taken out if theres enough controversy about it... I hadnt seen anything on that... and it was rather ambiguous... Would like to hear what happened with your teacher and BOS

m/c were either really easy or really hard... i wasnt that fussed on the short answer ones, i think i came up with the right stuff eventually though

another for question a) in crime was property offences... the break and enter and stuff

The males/females question sucked! In the exam i interpreted it completely wrong! I didnt even realise we were supposed to be comparing/contrasting the difference between males and females, i just thought we were supposed to contrast the different problems by young offenders... It sucked 12...

Interesting how we only got one supp. text for AoS (less than normal) but there was 3 specified (more than normal) for that paper...

It was at the start of the HSC saying we use however million writing booklets and exams and paper and stuff, so i'd be likely to believe it... however it does seem HUGE

I swear I read somewhere we use 2 tonnes of it in these exams... Mine all is in bows :)

I thought it was nice and easy... If you weren't prepared for values it could have been hard... but I studied 2 and ended up getting another in there, so I was happy. And easy to link context to the values- changing context makes them interesting to a modern audience!

I thought it was all really quite easy, they let us off for all english... General questions, nice and easy... I think module A could have been hard, I guess, but once I figured out what UI could say to answer the question, it was easy.

While i don't do poems for this section, and it is good that preprepared responses weren't able to be used, i do understand how you could not know 3 poems in depth enough to be able to talk about the third one really in depth...You can still know the overall and not know some of a third... but...