Search results

no.. he isnt.

electrons are particles...how can they pass on photons....? they possess kinetic energy

siyang don't try and take the easy path... there is no short cut to life. err sick of ur minimalist approaches..

ok, i think i get wot u guys are saying... there is another question like that that they could ask: impact of transformers on society... while looking over this one, i just realised that AC generators (what they stand for - i.e. AC electric distribution) would be meaningless and highly...

dunnoe... dont listen to what ppl say... its all a facade.

how do u ppl structure a question like this? especially an assess question..and what evidence would u put to suport argument?

a bit off the q, but how does more electrons ensure a greater energy supplied by the electron beam?

^^ yeah...i agree with the two posts directly above mine.

who told you these are the same methods? wrong! (in my opinion anyway) these are separate ways in which x-rays are produced. when the accelerated electrons collide with electrons in inner orbits of anode atoms, and electron from outer orbit drops down to inner orbit etc... that forms a...

yup. i think it is clear then.

ummm ppl.. my original question was how do i evaluate it as? do i say oh its good, even though it didn't establish the existence of aether (which it set out to do) because of the reliability, validity and accuracy (i would expand on these) of the experiment.... is that how i would evaluate...

can someone help me answer this dotpoint: 'discuss the principle of relativity' i dont know what to include in an answer if they ask such a question

wth how is production of x-rays an aspect of mri scans???

isnt it basically this?: a light beam travels at c from your frame of reference, regardless of your speed... (principle of relativity) a light beam travels at c for different frames of reference, regardless of their motion. (einstein's principle of special relativity) someone verify me.

rofl...ur statement is 'misleading' yes thats the trend these days... kidding. im not too sure. i wouldnt rely on trends.

yup. thats correct. only random endoscope one and the rest just looking at bloody scans and stuff :D:D:D

thats cool.. one question for everyone: evaluate the mm attempt to measure the relative velocity of the Earth through the aether. how would we evaluate this? i.e. say whether it was 'good' or 'bad' please help.

webers/meter^2 or tesla, don't u mean?

she just answered ur question and ur asking her the same thing again lol

i think ur talking about the general principle of relativity, not principle of general relativity lol :D