Search results

Eng adv: 85/100 Ex1: 40/50 Mx1: 95+/100 mx2: 90+/100 physics: 95+/100

Thats weird, try reloading the page. And no problem.

One might even say that once "I trembling drew the table near, and touched the curious wine" I discovered that "the ample bread twas so unlike the crumb." Emily Dickinson has never been so appropriate.

I am just chucking my hamlet and texts in time notes up: hamlet: here it is texts in time: here it is let me know if they are alright!

here are my hamlet notes; they are pretty comprehensive. Character analysis, soliloquy analysis and key scene analysis. here it is

Just thought I would chuck them up for you guys, hope they are helpful. here it is

The third was basically that the significance of belonging increased with time. The thirteen year old only needed a name to belong too. As he grew the absence of a place to belong too became more significant, as it symbolised a "rapture" in his past and "profoundly disturbed" him.

I did photo 4. Story about an old lady who has no legs and lives in a nursing home, she ain't all up in the belonging shiz. Then she has some stroke cause she doesn't take her meds, on purpose, and gets all demented and belongs. Irony: Ignorance is Bliss.

I thought it was straight forward, if you knew the texts it was piss easy. The comprehension was harder, but managable.

Section I: 14/15 Section II: 14/15 Section III: 15/15

The essay was basically how does ones understanding of belonging at the conclusion differ from that of the introduction. Easy peasy. Destroyed it. Creative was a cake walk, ripped it up with image 4. comprehension was harder, obscure in some regards, but doable.

They mark people down if they use a prescribed text as a related text. Even if you dont use the prescribed text as a prescribed text

Re: Got Emily Dickinson poetry for a prescribed text and have no idea for related tex Im doing a short story and the catcher in the rye. You dont need to have related texts that are similar, they could offer a contrast instead.

Just look cover say write check, like a little kid. It helps. Ive got half my dickinson poetry memorised

ratio of intercepts.

I think the problem is that people are used to going oh here is information A that obviously goes to answer B! This isn't the case in the last few questions, the answers can come from no where in particular. The secret here is comprehension, people get phased by the big symbols and inequality...

It's basically the same thing that I did but phrased differently. If you want to approach it typically it is just 2C1 ways of choosing a group of men to place down. Then its 2C1 to choose the women to the left, 1C1 way to choose the next pair of men and finally 1C1 way to choose the group of women.

In general, exposure to lots of questions will really help with this. For the question you posted, approach it like this. How many ways can I make two pairs of 4 men/women? Easy enough, its (4C2)*(2C2) per gender or (4C2)^2 in total. So we have 4 groups of 2 like gendered people. How many...

Read solutions, do harder stuff.

Yeah, I did everything that way except for c(i)... which i didnt get...