Search results

You really do a good job of mamking an idiot of yourself. UNSW has an excellent three level medical library that is separate. It needs this because of its large undergrad med program. I would hardly call a full three levels pathetic. Perhaps you didn't look upstairs? UNSW also has...

You use insults and nothing else to attack people. You did it first in this thread. Page one and page two before I even posted. It's your general method of posting in this forum. Insult people, insult political people. Insult and thats it. It dumbs down the place and it makes you look like...

Yes you did. First mindless insult of the thread. First page. Everyone was being mature and civil until you decided to lower the thread to your level when everyone was having a nice good discussiion civily. and then again. ...and then you get pissed when some insult back. Get real...

You are no where near as bad as thorny...and I made that clear. But its pretty obvious that you have little basing in politics. Again not your fault. Might as well. You do it. It's your method. Insults galore. Of course I'm going to insult back. I believe you dont remember correctly...

They have less idea than some. Notice that you are not listed as one of those idiot school kids. As explained. Its easier to lower. You have to in order to even discuss.

meh smoker...Jerk...i wouldnt let my daughter out with a smoker.

plug in your existing screen.....

Yes you were wrong. Wasn't hard to admit. If you didn't notice you can't get anywhere in this forum by reasoning. Simply might as well take up the method used by some of the members here. You ony have to have a quick look at the some of the threads to see that reason on both sides is...

He's an idiot for calling me a moron for spelling it correctly :p

You don't like me? I don't hate you. Maybe it's because I'm sticking you in places you don't like. I dont hate you nor Katie Tully. I pity you because you you seem to have no political education at all. I feel the same was about Katie Tully. I respect neo, Moonlight, Rorix and maybe even Not so...

Um I was right. You had no idea what the name of the ALP was. Admit it. It doesn't hurt to say you didn't know. You called me a fucking idiot for spelling it 'Australian Labor party' There are a number of people who support the liberal party in this forum who do know what they are talking...

So fuckwit who doesn't know the name of one of Australia's major political parties. What context was I using it in? Yes that's right. THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY. So what's your fucking problem? I used the correct word for the correct context. You my moronic friend couldn't couldnt even indetify...

Hahahhahha. Australian 'Labor' Party in Australia Labour party in England.

Somewhere inbetween hoping that it isn't true. If people were given the choice of massive tax cuts or free high standard education for all who want it...ie excellent public schools that rival the private sector I believe 'the people' would choose the massive tax cuts.

His performance as opposition leader was ok. He did OK. He was never ever going to win and that has to be kept in mind. Plus the ALP advertising was piss weak and too polite. The ALP had to WIN IT the libs were never gonna give it up. 'Ladder of opportunity' plus the interest rate...

I know. Redneck racist ville prefer the more old fashioned type of statesman. There sure as aint gonna vote for a young guy who talks funny.

You have to be fair. There was also that part where Howard directly used paragraphs from some book he read. Both sides plagerised. But in terms of political science and stats and whatever. The ALP was never going to win no matter what. No government looses when the economy is good, when we...

Its just like, i think, lawyers generally are able to choose their words better. Non committal words. Proper words that befit the situation. That are more subtle. Latham certainly showed a lack of subtlety and he choose his words poorly. It was a damn shame because this country needs a labor...

It just shows sometimes...in particular with latham. Its not a 'needed'. It just shows sometimes and it makes you cringe. Plus just look at all the Liberal party heavy hitters thesedays. Gotta have one of those law degrees to know how to 'manipulate' the truth ;)

I like jumping on you because you are a bit of a scatterbrain. Especially with your constant use of 'bleeding heart liberal' like you know what it actually means. It's pretty clear Latham has to go. The Sooner the better. But to suggest he is a total idiot is like me suggesting Howard is a Nazi.