Search results

I took extract as meaning two scences or at least little sections of the play.. It wasn't what i was expecting. But i just sorta talked about different interpretations and gave examples of how they would look at sections of the play. Crappy question though

about 50 for section1 40 for section 3 and 30 for section 2.. I rushed lear so much but got most of what i wanted out

I spent like 45-50 mins on bnw/br, then did telling the truth for as long as it took me, and ended up with only half an hour for king lear (i left it to last cause it was the worst question). I got most of what i wanted out, but i wrote like a page in that last minute.. I had to shorten my...

yeah, the question kind of threw me off. I do king lear and io guess the extracts meant talk about two scenes in the text.. And i was expecting the question to be more about other interpretations. So i just sort of talked about a few interpretations nd put examples of what they would think for...

Post modernists believe that there can be no truth (becaue of all contextual biases etc) that should sum it up

glitterfairy is probably right, but i do chunks anyway. If all the other aspects that they mark (like your sophisticated langues, content etc) are good then they probaly won't think much of it.

It is a family drama reading because Eyre (the director) focuses on Lears relationship with his daughters

You don't have to have your own reading. You can just talk about other productions and critical responses. Some people think that making up your own is good, and it might be, but you don't need it.

it's best try try and integrate the techniques the composers used in with each of your points like narelle said

Yeah, your opinion is your interpretation. If you are going to include it you can say I and my, though try and blend it in a little bit better than just "I think ..."

But can they ask you to discuss two different interpretation of a scene of your choice?

yeah i made some the other day on julius caesar, and basically went off the dot points, while thinking what i would need to put in an essay if i was asked about it. But i've done like no study for ancient yet. I have the 6 days before hand to study about 500 years history along with physics and...

yeah it would have to be mond or the director. But i think the director cause I remember him talking all about nature

Tate was made in 1681, because the british audiences couldn't take all the deaths at the end. He rewrote the play with a 'happy ending'. The only people who die are the villans (goneril, regan, edmond and cornwall), the fool is removed. cordelia and edgar get married and go on to rule england...

two scenes? i've never been asked to talk about scenes before.. just readings and productions

bugger that.. i'll do whatever poem i want

diary entry comes up a bit as well

Yeah, that happened to a mate in the trials. I really think it would have been better if you could have tried have another one. Cause they probably will think you took it from lack of having your own. But it is just such bad luck. But, i guess if you had good and varied other ad mat then they...

i reckon the second test is easier to study for. Because they are all 'essentially' essay question it should be more straight forward

I went to sleep at about 11 and got a solid 8 hours in. Felt refreshd for the test since i've been going a bit later with 3 weeks off