Search results

Only I think 20 is wrong, the inflation rate is clearly 3.1%

Nah mate

Surely 87 raw scales to 90

No????

Is 87 raw in this exam bad?

Linear, clearly linear

No that's way too far apparently they'll accept everything from 6.5 to 7.5

I also thought the same. Genetic drift can allow for natural selection no?

Fucked up, got 16.

Fuck based on those solutions I scored 16. Not good considering the whole of NSW said it was super easy...

How many marks out of 4 did I lose? 3?

For the agricultural disease I generically named sugarcane dieback and then talked about its ability to reduce yields, leading to increased costs demanded by agricultural producers, and potentially altered nature of sugar consumed by humans. Also talked about how it can force farmers to innovate...

You needed to annotate the graph for one mark, did you draw the least squares regression line and a LOBF?

Oh thank fuck I said it was the human

Can you post

Fuck! If dangerman is wrong in 18 means I’m wrong as well. That means I only scored 18/20 and that isn’t good considering it was an easy exam

Yes

We saw a decrease in CAD balance and a decrease in NFL. NFL does not include net secondary income.