Search results

So is that a bread made from bricks or a house made from bread?

Mate, theres always a difference, however minute. Unless 2 ppl can get the same marks in the exact same time etc.

Yea been quite a while since I saw any brick breads...

Its also unfair to have 100% based on externals. You'll have bludgers and one-hit wonders.

Yea well if someone can get 120/120 in 240 mins and another person can get 120/120 EVENTUALLY, say 500 minutes, obviously A is better at maths.

Sorry there is no such alternative and no such demand.

Well time management is part of the test.

So the demand for bread houses and baked bricks will be there if theres an increase in aggregate demand?

k. So they wouldn't be structurally unemployed in the first place. Because they are capable of doing the job, however badly.

Lol NO. Baker wouldnt be employed as a builder because he doesnt know how to build. If he was able to work as a builder, he would never have been structurally unemployed in the first place.

Overall the only way unemployment will fall is if firms hire unsuitable individuals such as structurally unemployed. Thus I have serious doubts.

Wow congratz. I think I did my best essays in my trials. Well I guess that was wasted... Meh not really lol.

Yea I don't think that table was necessary if you did good discussion within your writing. I think its definitely possible to get 20/20 without graphs etc. In fact I don't think you will be disadvantaged. I was the only one who got 20/20 in my trials and I had no graphs etc. I'm sure heaps of...

Oh well I've got things to reply to your previous post but I'll save those till the answers are out. BTW I meant to say "not below our NAIRU"(as I put out in numerous other posts), it was a mistype. Hence no contradiction.

I didn't do the globalisation essay so I wouldn't know. But what table/graph is this? I don't think I would've done one even if I did that essay.

Lol evil teachers ey? So much for recommended use of 0-100 for marking of assessments.

Yea I reckon high 80s raw would definitely be band 6. I remember seeing in 2004, a 87 in Physics aligned to 95 or something (correct me if im wrong). Meh I hope they mark rather leniently. Our teacher at school admits that she NEVER gives 20/20 for essays for our assessments.

Hmm yea but I have doubts getting 96-98 raw :uhoh:. My essays could've went a bit worse than I thought (at least the $A one) and bring me to low-mid 90s. But well anything over mid Band 6, I would be happy with.

Lol thx thats very nice. I hope I can get it but I would still be happy with a high HSC Mark for Eco. >96 HSC Mark would be alright. Ranking would just be a plus.

I think it really depends on my essays. If it went wellish... probably 96-98 raw? Would still probably lose 2 marks in essays. I might have lost marks in short ans etc. Overall I think I cant get it. Essays weren't top notch 20/20 and short ans probably may lose a mark here or there.