Search results

It already is extremely safe and sustainable.

It's inefficient. But hey, to each their own.

Pls point to the gay virus/bacterium and then I will take your point seriously. Also there is no evidence that homosexuality falls on the "nurture" side of the nature vs nurture debate.

Lol, Jimmy. That's all I have to say. Lol.

When I said it's difficult to read because of the lazy punctuation and grammar, I mean that those things make me NOT want to read it. It's probably a good idea to get into the habit of not being lazy when writing, to save going back and having to edit it so substantially.

I hope you're not serious.

What you're saying is "I look at all this evidence and facts and choose to ignore it anyway". Which means you're on par with Flat Earthers and creationists.

It's not a tedious argument. Take a look at the science. And by the way, there's a very good reason why the Earth was a "boiling pot of magma" 4 billion years ago - it had only just formed/coalesced. EDIT: b10

Joyce is a dick with most of his policies, but for now, he is a hero.

Totally contradicts what you said earlier: Care to make up your mind?

I mean, the dangers involved with childbirth itself vastly outweigh the meagre benefit of a brief oxytocin dose.

Lol, not really. The point with the oxytocin is that it helps cement the mother/infant bond, which I wouldn't really call a direct benefit of pregnancy (or, more correctly, child birth).

Whereas I just did a quick google search and found a reputable source that states that multiple full-term pregancies can increase your risk of cervical cancer. ACS :: What Are the Risk Factors for Cervical Cancer?

And oxytocin can also be released when cuddling your partner, having an orgasm, etc. Um, please provide a source for this statement.

Pregnancy can also in many cases be mortally dangerous to the erstwhile mother - see Type III diabetes, blood allergies, etc.

I don't think that's necessarily the case, given he's maintained his innocence. Are they welcoming him as a man finally freed after they believe he was wrongfully imprisoned, or are they welcoming him as a glorified terrorist? IDK.

Well, symbiotic relationships are recognised in humans as well, though these are usually behavioural rather than biological.

Um, there isn't AFAIK, except biologically (passing on one's genes). Hence why it's a parasitic relationship.

No, he's right. Parasitism is a form of symbiosis. You're thinking of mutualistic symbiosis, where both organisms benefit. Note that "symbiosis" refers simply to interactions between organisms, generally of different species.

Well, it's funny. Kick a pregnant lady in the stomach and cause a miscarriage, and it can be considered murder; abort, at any stage, and it may not be considered murder. An interesting dichotomy that I think needs to be answered, regarding murder, the definition of suffering, and whether or not...