Search results

even God has a preferred pronoun, hehe. :)

That question is very loaded. :) That is all I will say. Several things need to be address: 1. God is not a "sky daddy", and certainly isn't floating on clouds. 2. God is not an "it" like an animal is. 3. Is God demanding it or is he entitled? (If the second is any better). - In the same way...

my quoting is very dodgy though, lol :) sometimes I haven't quoted you lol :)

Yeah I know, it causes great doubt to the claim. The key thing is the amount of differences, examine: 1. No differences - copied 2. Some differences - ok and in fact good for witness testimony (which is what the Gospel and a lot of 'historical-type' accounts are) 3. Major difference -...

Sorry, SAMMYT123, I accidentally edited your post instead of mine, so to capture what you have said, what you said is quoted.... You have two grandfathers though not one. That is my point, one is not tracing Joseph's lineage. Does your mother have the same father as your father? No of course...

What you do mean by faith? That is the real question. I suspect there is not agreement on the term. So I will not answer. Don't know. Probably very little room for grey matter. Is Tacitus or Josephus not evidence? I think you will find almost all historical scholarship agrees that Jesus...

that is probably a wise thing. stuff on the internet barely changes people's minds

@SammyT123 what verse? that is what my last question which you brought up. I have only touched some of the ones raised in the 194, but I think there a lot of issues with the way that sites reads a lot of the text. Some of them, such as those around nativity concerning the genealogy, as I have...

ok, i will list as not having solutions.

Theology problems with some objections: and this is just a small selection... [52] Misunderstanding about who is righteous. People are declared righteousness because of Jesus (skeptic failed to read Romans 3:10 in context), other two verses flow logically fit in with Paul's argument in Romans...

Part 2: your quotes don't have your name on them oh well No, of course not but it causes great doubt to the claim. It is a legal argument of witness, rather than a english argument. If every person recounted the story EXACTLY the same, as in a test, then that would show that they are MOST...

Yep even after the disciples saw the feeding of the 4000, and the 5000, they still didn't believe or understand properly. In fact they are pretty "daft" if you would like throughout most of the accounts, (doesn't look too good for them) It is in Jewish literature. The account in Genesis is 6 +...

Your essay and the Bible are two different things because basically your argument is: - If they are the same, they were copied (make sense it is called plagiarism) - If they are different, they still were copied. So there is your assumption. You assume they must be copied or if they weren't...

Not really. Show it? I think you will find the parents didn't quite understand fully what was going on at the time. So it reasonable to think that "“Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name...

Most of the supposed contradictions can be explained by the fact that they are corroborating accounts. The fact that they differ on the details debunks the claim that they just copied off each account, and show they are independent accounts. Think of it as different people recounting the same...

I won't be perfect, but some of those I will/can address. Hold on a sec.

No where in the Bible, does it say that the Sun orbits the Earth. The Bible has been used incorrectly in the past. That is one big if. I take the new testament as fairly accurate because of its preservation. In regards to the Old Testament, it would depend on what inaccuracy you are referring...

yeah and? we don't yet have a proof for the Riemann Hypothesis? what is your point? you may need to provide concrete examples

Not to mention scientific inaccuracies in the past with regards to any text, not just the religious. (Aristotle cannot certainly be entirely right). You would have to mention specific examples. By magical I presume you mean "relating to, using, or resembling magic." You probably need to...

tldr?