Maybe I went a bit too far with dismissing it as nonsense pseudo-science (maybe not far enough), but I regardless have a huge amount of suspicion for it simply because there is no empirical evidence for its efficacy. It's not an "advancement" of our understanding of said mental states and the...
If we considered it necessary to be moved, it would have been moved.
Do you think all topics about education should be moved to the school folders, and all discussion about drug legalisation to the health subforums? :rolleyes:
IDK, I sit somewhere on the fence. Regardless of the idiocy of drug use being illegal, it currently is illegal, and I'm not much of a fan of my taxes going to someone who's just going to spend it on drugs. And yes, that's more of an emotional argument than a logical one.
To be fair, to the Mayans (and to a certain extent, other Central American cultures like the Aztecs, Toltecs, Olmecs, etc) the world had ended/began again several times. The world ending was really nothing new. I wouldn't pay much attention to it.
Germ theory is testable in laboratory conditions by exactly what you said - it makes "predictions" that are proven accurate in the lab and in real world conditions.
While the last bolded bit is certainly true, both evolution and its subset (germ theory) meet the requirements of falsifiability...
Hurr. Psychiatry is medicine-based treatment of mental disorders; psychology is, well treatment of the mind. Each has its uses, but psychiatry is most certainly not pseudo-science. Given what psychology actually treats, it can be seen as far more "untestable and unfalsifiable" than psychiatry...
Lol no? It's treated with stimulants, like ritalin or dexies.
Bad analogy, but in people with ADHD, stimulants and depressants sort of do the.. opposite.
Well, I guess it depends on the animal. For, say, small reptiles, you'd do random quadrats of an area, and produce a distribution map based on what you found in the quadrats. IDK what a "profile sketch" is.