Search results

So now you're saying that homosexuals are not capable of feeling real "bona fide" love?

PPS: we are animals. And we very much act like animals, even with all our techonolgy and societal advances. Heck, you're displaying it now: parochial xenophobia against a group that is not your own and you see as a threat to your own. It's all in the genes, babe.

If they want to. Why shouldn't they?

Lol, no - the parochial altuists that DO survive get all the girls :p

But just because one's own Darwinian fitness is negligable, it doesn't mean that your genes don't proliferate in the gene pool and thus contribute to the overall genetic makeup. Parochial altruists, i.e. members of a group who fight other groups for the benefit of their own group, often die...

How is homosexuality NOT morally correct? A straight answer, please.

Ahh, a glorified creationist. It all makes sense now.

Why is it for the betterment of humanity and the human race? Homosexuals don't often reproduce, so they're not contributing to the genepool. Given this, what further are your views?

Well I don't think you'd want to eat a whale full of the poisons used to kill it..

Sex is much more than the creation of life, dude. I think you need to get laid. And it's not sacred - it only is because your fucking brainwashing church decided it was. I respect life less because I use birth control? Get fucked.

Instinctive homosexuals? Homosexuality is not "instinct". It is genetic. They can't help it any more than a woman born barren, and a woman being born barren is as much anti-life as a homosexual. I can't believe you just said that. So homosexuality = the great and terrifying capitalist...

I'm still not getting it, apparently. - I agree, heterosexual unions produce children, which furthers the species. But how does that harm the family unit? - A homosexual does not undermine heterosexual sex, or prevent it from happening. Moreover, homosexuals can't suddenly NOT be homosexual and...

Why is it such a long leap? An infertile heterosexual couple is essentially the same as a homosexual couple; they still love, and experience joy in each other's company, but cannot have children. They're both natural, selfless unions which celebrate love and life. In your words, it is a...

Oh, I'm just messing with him because he's a bigoted arsehole. See: other threads. :p

Do couples that have sex when the woman or man is infertile devalue the love and joy of sex and thus life? Does it undermine other heterosexual couples because it is a union that cannot produce life?

How would it? People being gay doesn't stop heterosexual couples having lots of sex and babies.

Why would it be?

You sound remarkably like one to me; just one in denial. Why? You're essentially saying the same as "blacks aren't natural, I do not believe in them, I don't think blacks should be encouraged". Why do you think a sexual relationship is only between a man and a woman? What made you form...

Just because it's natural, doesn't make it always right. Genocide, xenophobia, racism, war; all of these are genetic and natural, but doesn't make them right.

A higher standard of 'goodness'? Please explain. Also, bigboyjames, why DO you think homosexuality, if not (as you claim) for religious or socially-induced reasons?