Search results

I'd agree that there are some things israel does which are theoretically illegal, but until you actually get me some sort of a ruling (which you won't) it's pointless. You can't state whether something is definitely legal/illegal until it's been tested through the courts and even if it was found...

What is 'illegal' matters little to me compared with the question of what is 'fair' and even then we have to look at it from a practical, pragmatic point of view in regard to what is politically possible.

History seems to indicate that those whose land is conquered by another lose it. No reason? If for instance Hammas was launching attacks on israel which threatened the lives of far many more israeli citizens than the palestinians whom israel has (very arguably for the most part accidently)...

I think what israel does to palestinians is wrong... purely by looking at the numbers of civilians killed by israeli actions vs palestinian actions, let alone if we were to look at the number of lives on each side inconvenienced. On the other hand of course israel does have some good reasons for...

Without a good knowledge of the legal ramifications of the various bills you're voting on you'll be stabbing in the dark. Lawyers and Unionists deal with legislation, contracts etc all the time, they're used to it. A scientist can be a very, very smart fellow and someone we should listen to for...

It depends on what sort of a burden of proof you want to have. If you do not believe in fairies and you place the same burden of proof on God as you do fairies then yes I believe I can provide an argument which logically must 'prove' God does not exist. lol @ Ziggo.

Anyway the manager told me he's going to be calling into head office because they take this sort of thing very seriously, he's seen the thread and has a pretty good idea who it probably was.

okay so im calling back at 3 so I can talk to the store manager.

hmm im gunna call up kfc 5 dock and tell them.

tbh i'd still eat from your store even if everything you said is 100% correct. It's fried in boiling hot fat... the only thing that's of any concern is when u drop it on the floor but tbh I'd do the same if I was cooking at home.

tbh the bushfire deaths were overhyped anyway.

The harm is that there's a bias in their marking standards and the school will be seriously disrupted by students/parents questioning this. Sure you can draw an analogy between this and an employer screwing one of his employees, but I feel the difference here would be that. - Kids have to go to...

Impossible :c

If people desire an outlet for rebellious behaviour they will find one... Say graffiti becomes legalised in public places, the new big thing will be doing it to people's cars or something.

I don't think we should have artwork etc on trains... Even though the best of it has nothing to do with it, most of it is associated with gangster wannabe's who already overpopulate our trains and just furthers a bad image that leads to less people using public transport. We should have spots...

lmfao yeah if we all had guns then we could discipline the government...

I have absolutely no problem with public graffiti zones, what I do have a problem with is graffiti on ANY public property and especially on people's private property. As for artworks on the side of our trains.... I think there's a big difference between 'artworks' and the vast majority of...

hehe dun wanna say :o

I think that's wrong.

Why not?