MedVision ad

2007 NRL Thread (2 Viewers)

Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Messages
2,359
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
For those who are interested, the Australian team has been named for the anzac test.

Australia

1. Hunt
2. Tate
3. Lyon
4. Hodges
5. King
6. Lockyer (c)
7. Thurston
8. Kite
9. Smith
10. Civoneceva
11. Mason
12. Hindmarsh
13. Ryan

14. Bailey
15. Berrigan
16. Simpson
17. Tupou
 

onebytwo

Recession '08
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
823
Location
inner west
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
trao06 said:
hey all! im kinda new to bos so i figured i would intro my team and such lol
PARRAMATTA EELS!! =D
and i would like to add that i HATE daniel wagon and think that buying brett finch instead of keeping john morris was the stupidest thing they could do, and blake green does a way better job!
but they are in form with 3 wins in a row yayaya!
how many eels fans in here? :)
welcome to the bored, the eels suck.:wave:

uhoh, the sharks did it again, destroyed by the man who did it last time at shark park, the graceful benji, didnt watch the match, but does anyone know if he's still apprehensive becuase of his right shoulder, he always seems to flinch when attacking
 

jemsta

I sit here alone
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,711
Location
O.P
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
ay the eels are in the top 8
its the battle of the wooden spooners tomorrow night
lets see whether the roosters can notch up their 1000th win
 

onebytwo

Recession '08
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
823
Location
inner west
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
i think its funny how the australian selectors play kite at number 8, he looks slim and built enough to be a winger. anyway, i think he's rubbish.
 

iamsickofyear12

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,960
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Exphate said:
How the fuck does Hunt get into the Australian team
Because of his apparent combination with Lockyer. Lockyer is automatically in so Hint is automatically in.

I don't think the selectors pick enough on form. If you had the spot last year it is almost impossible to lose it. I don't like it at all. So from now on I am supporting NZ whether they have any hope of winning or not.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
2,524
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
I can't believe Finch and Anasta aren't in that team!!! :eek:

Hahaha, j/k.

I've gotta say I'm glad Minichiello wasn't picked though; I really don't want him getting injured.
jemsta said:
lets see whether the roosters can notch up their 1000th win
Of course they will... :eek::eek::eek:
 

SyCoTiC

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
232
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
watatank said:
Brenton Bowen may be fast, but he couldn't defend to save his life. I can't believe you're even considering him when Qld have a plethora of talent to choose from.

Everyone dismisses Ryles, but he is a proven performer at rep level, and he's one of the form props in the competition, and for all the Dragons shitness this year he has been playing awesome. If anything people talk up O'Meley way too much, he isn't as brilliant as everyone thinks.

The respective backlines aren't that badly matched although I have to concede with the Australian halves Qld has quite an advantage there. Qld are more potentially dangerous but NSW have the ability to stop them.

In any case it all hinges on the forward battle. NSW dominated the first match and won, but the other times the Qld forwards dominated.
Brenton Bowen is the in-form QLD winger in the competition and we have lacked that in-depth winger which has been shown by playing Inglis there as well as Mogg though he proved to be a surprising good inclusion to the squad.

Ryles has not really proven that because he has barely been playing solid and consistent rep footy since playing himself out of form in club football which is the platform to make your bid in gaining that rep spot on both SoO and Test football.

NSW's backline is formidable and boast the height advantage but they are not explosive enough and this has been further weakened due to Gasnier being unavailable selection. O'Meley is not particularly overrated IMO and has performed on the big stage and gets his job done whether it is shown up on the stats or not and is a proven defender as opposed to Ryles who has a tendency to give away the occasional piggy-back ride during the end of sets.

Forwards will play a dominating role but it will depend more on the halves and both teams' efforts in being cohesive to be able to gain the dominance. Origin has proven that defense is probably the most important aspect of the game and both teams will need to tussle it out until one cracks.

HotShot said:
I think the blues have better forwards by QLD, but QLD will own us in the backs. I dont think Brenton BOwen will play in the wings, - expect Tate. Hunt wont be fullback either- it will most likely go to Bowen as first choice.

NSW forwards - HIndmarsh, Bailey, Mason, O'Meley.

Minnichello wont make it - too much of a risk. Hodgson is a much better especially defending against short through kicks form thurston or lockyer.

Its really Farah vs Buderus - buderus will be favoured cos he has to be captain.
Five-eight - Hornby - no way we will lose almost certain if he is.

Surely there is someone better.

we have good centres, and wings, its just the halfback and five eight going to be a problem. Cooper and Gasnier in the centres. King and Haynes in the wing.
Believe me, even as a Broncos supporter, Tate will not be selected. He has been playing absolutely atrociously and has failed to play himself into any sort of form for the first 5 games of the season. It would be a disgrace to have him selected as he has not earned it and there are far better wingers out there who have been performing their asses off since the start of the season.

Minichiello will be selected because he is as safe under the high ball as any fullback there is and he has barely any weaknesses in his game.

Brenton Bowen - Read above.

Bedsy will be picked based on the fact that he's been there done that, pretty much owns the captaincy as you said and also has the size on the paddock as opposed to Farah. Many players (like Matt Bowen) have shown that size does matter in SoO and many have not been able to perform in SoO due to their lack in size (ie. Hodgson) which brings me to the point that Hunt will be taking the fullback spot because he, much like Mini, is a proven safety net under the high ball and also is beginning to run harder and harder at the line. Darren Lockyer at five-eighth is another reason why he will be picked over Bowen as he is able to play a lot better at set plays with Lockyer around as they play the same style in club football at Brisbane.

Hornby will come off the bench as he is a very good utility and you can expect Gower at halfback as he is playing very well at the moment and perhaps Jamie Lyon at five eighth despite his long absence from the NRL.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Messages
2,359
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Brenton Bowen cannot defend. Specialist wingers are overrated anyway, why would you pick Bowen if you can pick someone like Slater, Wesser, even Tate is ahead of him? I'd even pick Israel Falou from before Bowen.

Ryles is in great form, and especially from the back end of last year, and has got better this year. He dominated the Broncos pack last time they met the Dragons as well. But I suppose as a Broncos supporter you choose to ignore that. He may have a tendency at times to give away a penalty or so but he's worked really hard on that aspect and he isn't enough of a liability to be ignored.

O'meley isn't nearly as good as people think IMO. He's good for a decent run every now and then but most of the time goes missing and can't really be relied upon when the shit hits the fan. That's not to say he is terrible but he's not that good either IMO.

I justified my choice of Hornby at five eighth. Lyon? What is that based on? You mean the first twenty minutes he played in round one before he was switched to the centres, and the myth going around that he starred in england at five eighth? (he played a couple of games there or something and he hardly starred, he starred at centre though). He's had a grand total of about three games there. Wouldn't suprise me if he was picked there though, they did that with Gasnier last year, but then again that was a total disaster.

If Buderus is fit he will play. Farah will get a shot eventually but not this year barring injury

Tate will get picked because he is highly rated by those who matter.

I also expect Orford to make his debut this year, if he can show his form warrants it when comes back from injury. I just have doubts over his ability in rep football now but i hope to be proved wrong.
 

jemsta

I sit here alone
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,711
Location
O.P
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
hahaha raiders beat the roosters
i dont think that the roosters will be getting their 1000th win anytime soon
 

SyCoTiC

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
232
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
watatank said:
Brenton Bowen cannot defend. Specialist wingers are overrated anyway, why would you pick Bowen if you can pick someone like Slater, Wesser, even Tate is ahead of him? I'd even pick Israel Falou from before Bowen.

Ryles is in great form, and especially from the back end of last year, and has got better this year. He dominated the Broncos pack last time they met the Dragons as well. But I suppose as a Broncos supporter you choose to ignore that. He may have a tendency at times to give away a penalty or so but he's worked really hard on that aspect and he isn't enough of a liability to be ignored.

O'meley isn't nearly as good as people think IMO. He's good for a decent run every now and then but most of the time goes missing and can't really be relied upon when the shit hits the fan. That's not to say he is terrible but he's not that good either IMO.

I justified my choice of Hornby at five eighth. Lyon? What is that based on? You mean the first twenty minutes he played in round one before he was switched to the centres, and the myth going around that he starred in england at five eighth? (he played a couple of games there or something and he hardly starred, he starred at centre though). He's had a grand total of about three games there. Wouldn't suprise me if he was picked there though, they did that with Gasnier last year, but then again that was a total disaster.

If Buderus is fit he will play. Farah will get a shot eventually but not this year barring injury

Tate will get picked because he is highly rated by those who matter.

I also expect Orford to make his debut this year, if he can show his form warrants it when comes back from injury. I just have doubts over his ability in rep football now but i hope to be proved wrong.
Israel Falou? Didn't know the kid was eligible for Queensland let alone whether or not he is eligible for State of Origin. I wouldn't pick Slater on the wing, he has been put there before and has failed miserably as has Wesser who even managed to choke at his favoured position. Though Tate is highly regarded, his atrocious form is suggesting otherwise because he had been in-form during the Origin period. This time around is very much different in so many ways than one.

Though I do agree that Ryles can be very dynamic when he 'wants to be' but all I'm saying is that there are plenty of front rowers out there who are playing far better than him and are much more dynamic than him. I'm not ignorant of the fact that he dominated the game against the Broncos because I remember that clearly because of the fact I was expecting him to have a shocker against a pack that should've played far better than the Dragons but you cannot pass judgement based on one game even though you're probably not.

The fact of the matter is, I don't think Ryles' running style is fit for Origin and that has been proven time and time again when he has been picked. The man is neither aware of this or hasn't bothered to change his running style, he practically runs upright and being the good large size he is, he leaves his abdominal area clearly open to be struck and on a stage like SoO, you are going to get punished both on the statistics as well as physically. He needs to fix that up not to mention several other parts of his game before playing himself back into contention because IMO Bailey and O'Meley seem the better candidates on the starting line up. You're hard pressed with a NSW forward pack like that.

I think Lyon will be picked at five eighth and selectors have shown in the past that they're willing to play players out of position even if they've had limited game time with it both in SoO as well as club level. Examples:
Thurston to Halfback.
Mason to Prop.
Slater on the Wing.
Minichiello at Fullback.
Lockyer at Five Eighth.
Webcke in the Front Row. (He was previously a second rower)
Wing at Hooker.
Gasnier at Five Eighth.
O'Donnell at Lock.
Bowen at Hooker.

And so forth...

Both successes and failures but that is enough to suggest that you have a 50/50 chance of it working out and Lyon is a proven representative player so why the hell not? I can't see many other good, established choices out there. Perhaps some rookie youngster but with the competitiveness of Origin, selectors won't be willing unless he is somewhat amazing like Hayne and Inglis in their debut year.

Orford will make his debut considering they have space for Hornby on the bench otherwise I think Hornby would be my tip to play halfback. He is a genuine ball-playing, support-playing half. I rate him highly.

And finally, I'd be spewing if Tate is on the team. He has done absolutely nothing to deserve it, much like Tahu who has not proven a thing in club level footy for a very long time to deserve a spot on the team.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
210
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
NSW:
1.)minichello
2.)hayne
3.)lyon
4.)king
5.)rooney
6.)anasta
7.)kimmorley/gower
8.)omeley
9.)buderus
10.)bailey
11.)mason
12.)hindmarsh
13.)ryan
14.) some person
15.) simpson
16.)kite
17.) hornby/farah

comapred to QLD, we are gonna struggle
 

wuddie

Black by Demand
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
1,386
Location
right here, can't you see?
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
why the hell would you have anasta as 5/8? look at how the roosters are playing and their attack. i say give kurt gidley a run, he's been playing out of his skin.

and rooney?? jeez i am glad you are not a selector.
 

iamsickofyear12

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,960
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
wuddie said:
why the hell would you have anasta as 5/8? look at how the roosters are playing and their attack. i say give kurt gidley a run, he's been playing out of his skin.
Anasta is not a 5/8, he is a lock, and he is not even a good lock.
 

SyCoTiC

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
232
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Why not Rooney? Very strong, knows how to finish, solid defender, has the jump for the high balls and has been in very good form as well as a very good supporter of the ball for the forwards when they get tired.

Almost flawless when on his game if you ask me.

Anasta is a ball-playing lock but hasn't been playing there much until after he came from the Dogs but still is very good. Has been solid in Origin when given the chance apart from the most recent series which he did absolutely nothing to benefit the NSW team.
 

wuddie

Black by Demand
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
1,386
Location
right here, can't you see?
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
no. anasta is only good when he can compliment a match winning halfback, and i can't rely on either gower or kimmorley to win the game for nsw.

now that i come to think of it, nsw doesn't have too many decent and experienced wingers around anymore, and i really think rooney is only a fallback option (a bit like finch...), no offense to the guy.
 

SyCoTiC

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
232
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Rooney made a name for himself during the Panthers' premiership year. He is as good as anyone running around at the moment and I say that genuinely - He's a damn good player when in-form which he pretty much is at the moment.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top