Lexicographer
Retired 13 May 2006
That might be a good thing. As long as I don't prove myself stupid I'm happy. 
actuaries??-whats that (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter freaking_out
- Start date
Rahul
Dead Member
(11.73 posts per day)...at this rate i shoudl go past you on the 12th jan '04.Originally posted by flyin'
[Average=10.00]
freaking_out
Saddam's new life
yep lexi's gonna catch up with u even sooner prolly.Originally posted by flyin'
Notes to self - start postin' at 11.74 posts today to prevent the unlikely outcome of a 12th Jan '04.
Lexicographer
Retired 13 May 2006
You'll have to double your post rate to equal mine. Of course, you'll have to make a reasonable number of posts relevant and helpful to stop Minai from resetting your ass
(21.61)
(21.61)
freaking_out
Saddam's new life
loook...ur post counts r there just bcoz minai doesn't understand japanese!!!Originally posted by Lexicographer
You'll have to double your post rate to equal mine. Of course, you'll have to make a reasonable number of posts relevant and helpful to stop Minai from resetting your ass
(21.61)
Rahul
Dead Member
but you have forgotten the rahul conjecture
R(t)=b(x).q(x)
where b(x) is the expectancy of bored's existence
q(x) is slighlty more complicated.
it is defined as:
q(x)=[b(x)-r(x)]p(t)
where r(x) is time that rahul has been on bored and p(t) is the post count avg for a time t. b(x) was defined earlier...
notice that calculus can be used to calculate extreme spammage-ing. but that has to be related to the time-stress(hsc) function
R(t)=b(x).q(x)
where b(x) is the expectancy of bored's existence
q(x) is slighlty more complicated.
it is defined as:
q(x)=[b(x)-r(x)]p(t)
where r(x) is time that rahul has been on bored and p(t) is the post count avg for a time t. b(x) was defined earlier...
notice that calculus can be used to calculate extreme spammage-ing. but that has to be related to the time-stress(hsc) function
Don't worry, I'll take care of half your posts with a Delete option, I have here.Originally posted by Lexicographer
You'll have to double your post rate to equal mine. Of course, you'll have to make a reasonable number of posts relevant and helpful to stop Minai from resetting your ass
(21.61)
That's so true.Originally posted by freaking_out
loook...ur post counts r there just bcoz minai doesn't understand japanese!!!
Rahul, that's a little crazy. :rofl:
freaking_out
Saddam's new life
yeah, a nerd joke...
jus revivin an old thread... forgive my ignorance...
can dey still get a job even though dey dont gain exemptions and jus pass their way thru??? at unsw dat is...
n gain part 1/part 2 whilst working??
edit: more to the point, would firms hire them???
Last edited:
It's certainly not impossible. A few of my friends did not get many of Part I exemptions, got jobs as generic commerce grads (claims management, business banking etc) and then moved to actuarial positions via internal transfer.
They are expected to get the qualification as soon as possible though and it is a lot harder when you work.
In any case I would suggest doing Part I through UK IA while you are still at uni.
They are expected to get the qualification as soon as possible though and it is a lot harder when you work.
In any case I would suggest doing Part I through UK IA while you are still at uni.
Rahul
Dead Member
lol....well not quite halfOriginally posted by flyin'
Don't worry, I'll take care of half your posts with a Delete option, I have here.
the tree has spread its roots well*taps nose*
haha yes, it was maths procastination i think