George W. Bush
Banned
There is no causal link. It's like if you buy a dog, keep it in your house for 6 months, then let it go out on the street and 10 years later it comes to your house and bites you. It's not your fault.
It fells good!! Well rigging is so harsh - more like supporting all the major caompanies and getting millions for campaign purposes, well theres alot more but remember it not how he wins its if he wins - an yes we all hate Global Warming Bush just like we all hate SoDamn Insane!!Originally posted by euripidies
Hey George W. Bush hows it feel rigging an election and getting away with it?
If america allowed the soviets to move in they would of crushed the taliban and allowed more freedom from IslamOriginally posted by George W. Bush
More importantly, why should we care?
Because the US government is 'interfering' in the affairs of other states? Well, if that's a bad thing, I guess we should just stop all foreign aid, foreign consultation, aid programs, humanitarian missions etc. - I mean, we wouldn't want to interfere!
And, I mean, how DARE America remove the Taliban from power and attempt to hunt down Osama bin Laden
I like the bit where you realised that this describes every single democracy. That bit was my favourite.Originally posted by Snapwizard
It fells good!! Well rigging is so harsh - more like supporting all the major caompanies and getting millions for campaign purposes, well theres alot more but remember it not how he wins its if he wins - an yes we all hate Global Warming Bush just like we all hate SoDamn Insane!!
What is this, The Crusades version 20th century? America isn't fighting a war on Islam, it's fighting a war on terrorism which generally co-oresponds to radical militant Islam. We didn't force Christianity on Afghanistan, and we're not going to force Christianity on Iraq. In fact, it's probably safe to say that not a supporter of the Coalition thinks Afghanistan or Iraq was going to adopt Christianity - and neither should they. We're not trying to spread Christianity, we're fighting terrorism - those who prey on civilians. "You should have let Russia invade Afghanistan to keep Islam down" is one of the worst arguments I've ever heard.If america allowed the soviets to move in they would of crushed the taliban and allowed more freedom from Islam
I fail to see the relevance.You forgot to mention the pipeline america installed there after they invaded, which would of cost millions of dollars.
Sooooo, what's the poverty situation like in China these days? And FTAs spread technology, create infrastructure and in general raise the standard of living in the poorer countries. If what you were saying was correct, we'd expect African nations to not require much aid, because the USA isn't 'wrecking' these economies with FTAs.America would not have to worry about giving so much foriegn aid if they 1)Let leftist leaders rule there countries with out interferance 2) Stop forcing on free trade aggreement with undeveloped countries, which cant handle advanced capitalist countries.
What are you talking about i never once said that it was a war against Islam, what i said was it would of been better for the soviets to take over afghanistan and free them from islamic oppresion the taliban.Originally posted by George W. Bush
What is this, The Crusades version 20th century? America isn't fighting a war on Islam, it's fighting a war on terrorism which generally co-oresponds to radical militant Islam. We didn't force Christianity on Afghanistan, and we're not going to force Christianity on Iraq. In fact, it's probably safe to say that not a supporter of the Coalition thinks Afghanistan or Iraq was going to adopt Christianity - and neither should they. We're not trying to spread Christianity, we're fighting terrorism - those who prey on civilians.
[/B]
That's what you wrote. You do, uh, realise, that the Afghanis are Islamic, do you not? Why should America support Russia's attempt for the reason you provide which basically amounts to forcing the Afghanis to change religions?If america allowed the soviets to move in they would of crushed the taliban and allowed more freedom from Islam
Eh, nothing's perfect.So let's implement the trickle down effect instead! Hell, the general populace will still be fucked but at least the exec's can make some money!
what does "freeing them from islam" imply, then?Originally posted by Comrade nathan
I never mentioned changing there religion manly freeing them from islam oppresion the talibans perspective of the Quran.