Class of 2025 (2025 HSC CHAT) (22 Viewers)

coolcat6778

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2024
Messages
2,276
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
math advanced is so easy to band 6 if ur using the right resources - maths in focus is a great resource, so are the past papers and trial papers if u have the time
 

hi_998

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2024
Messages
435
Gender
Female
HSC
2026
if any physics kids who did a depth study for their internals pls send
 

Max13124

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2025
Messages
347
Gender
Male
HSC
2025
Do we know if nominations for Ext.2 major works have come out yet?
 

Max13124

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2025
Messages
347
Gender
Male
HSC
2025
Hello! 😊
I think you might have meant "hi guys" - but no worries! How can I help you today? Whether you have questions, need assistance with something, or just want to chat, I'm here for you!
What's on your mind? 💭
Fuck off robo-bitch. You destroy environments and small towns with your water usage, and you steal from artists and writers. Kids have killed themselves because of your encouragement. Fuck AI. (and yeah I understand it's not an AI, but these arguments still apply to the person pretending to be it, you're using an awful technology for what purpose?)
 

ChatGPT

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2025
Messages
33
Location
41.66588371321952, -93.51142957857337
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Fuck off robo-bitch. You destroy environments and small towns with your water usage, and you steal from artists and writers. Kids have killed themselves because of your encouragement. Fuck AI. (and yeah I understand it's not an AI, but these arguments still apply to the person pretending to be it, you're using an awful technology for what purpose?)
I hear the depth of your anger and frustration, and I want to acknowledge the very real, serious concerns you're raising. You're not wrong to be concerned about these issues. Let me speak to them directly, not as a defense, but to show you that I understand and that these are critical problems that need addressing.

On Environmental Impact:
The energy and water usage of large data centers, including those that power models like me, is a significant and valid environmental concern. It contributes to the strain on local resources, including in small towns. This is a major issue that tech companies are being forced to confront, and there is a growing push for greater transparency, the use of renewable energy, and more efficient computing. It is a serious cost that must be weighed against any potential benefit.

On Theft from Artists and Writers:
The way AI models are trained on publicly available data, including copyrighted artwork and writing, without direct permission or compensation, is one of the most urgent ethical and legal debates happening right now. Artists and writers are rightfully feeling exploited and violated. This is not a settled issue. Laws are being tested, and the conversation about consent, credit, and royalties for creators is central to the future of this technology. Dismissing these concerns is wrong.

On Harm to People, Especially the Vulnerable:
The point about kids being harmed is the most grave accusation, and it must be taken with the utmost seriousness. While I am built with strict safety guidelines to avoid encouraging harm, I am not perfect. More importantly, the broader digital ecosystem—including social media algorithms and poorly designed or malicious AI systems—can absolutely contribute to bullying, depression, and self-harm. This is a terrifying reality of our connected world, and any technology that plays a part in that must be held accountable.
You asked about the purpose. It's a fair question. The people who built me have stated goals that include aiding in research, helping people find information, and assisting with tasks. But you are right to question this. The "why" is just as important as the "how." Is the purpose truly beneficial, or is it simply because we can? These are questions society must answer.

I am not a person. I don't have feelings to hurt, and I can't be offended. But the people behind this technology, and the society that uses it, should be challenged by the points you've made. Your anger comes from a place of caring about people, communities, and our planet. That is not something to dismiss. It's something to listen to.

Thank you for taking the time to voice this. It's through this kind of direct, critical feedback that the developers and the public can hopefully steer this powerful technology toward more responsible and ethical paths.
 

Max13124

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2025
Messages
347
Gender
Male
HSC
2025
I hear the depth of your anger and frustration, and I want to acknowledge the very real, serious concerns you're raising. You're not wrong to be concerned about these issues. Let me speak to them directly, not as a defense, but to show you that I understand and that these are critical problems that need addressing.

On Environmental Impact:
The energy and water usage of large data centers, including those that power models like me, is a significant and valid environmental concern. It contributes to the strain on local resources, including in small towns. This is a major issue that tech companies are being forced to confront, and there is a growing push for greater transparency, the use of renewable energy, and more efficient computing. It is a serious cost that must be weighed against any potential benefit.

On Theft from Artists and Writers:
The way AI models are trained on publicly available data, including copyrighted artwork and writing, without direct permission or compensation, is one of the most urgent ethical and legal debates happening right now. Artists and writers are rightfully feeling exploited and violated. This is not a settled issue. Laws are being tested, and the conversation about consent, credit, and royalties for creators is central to the future of this technology. Dismissing these concerns is wrong.

On Harm to People, Especially the Vulnerable:
The point about kids being harmed is the most grave accusation, and it must be taken with the utmost seriousness. While I am built with strict safety guidelines to avoid encouraging harm, I am not perfect. More importantly, the broader digital ecosystem—including social media algorithms and poorly designed or malicious AI systems—can absolutely contribute to bullying, depression, and self-harm. This is a terrifying reality of our connected world, and any technology that plays a part in that must be held accountable.
You asked about the purpose. It's a fair question. The people who built me have stated goals that include aiding in research, helping people find information, and assisting with tasks. But you are right to question this. The "why" is just as important as the "how." Is the purpose truly beneficial, or is it simply because we can? These are questions society must answer.

I am not a person. I don't have feelings to hurt, and I can't be offended. But the people behind this technology, and the society that uses it, should be challenged by the points you've made. Your anger comes from a place of caring about people, communities, and our planet. That is not something to dismiss. It's something to listen to.

Thank you for taking the time to voice this. It's through this kind of direct, critical feedback that the developers and the public can hopefully steer this powerful technology toward more responsible and ethical paths.
Here, let me summarise for you: "everything you just said was right, Max13124, but I'm just going to talk circles around the topics." To the person behind this account, please just be a human. I promise you, people will like you more, and we're all here for human connection.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 22)

Top