Contradiction, i think (1 Viewer)

[Logix]

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i get it now, thx

so we cant use that method, huh?

 

[Slidey]

Oh, and what if a, b or c = 0?

I think this guy isn't telling us all the conditions, such as a,b,c>0

 

[Logix]

no

a>0, b>0, c>0
and
a+b+c=1

these r the conditions

 

[Slidey]

no

a>0, b>0, c>0
and
a+b+c=1

these r the conditions

And you only thought to tell us all of the conditions now?

Sorry if I seem a bit caustic.

 

[Logix]

no, i told u all in the first thread or maybe the 2nd

 

[Logix]

well the a+b+c=1 anyways....forgot to mention a>0, b>0 and c>0

sorry bout that all

 

[dawso]

lol, yeah, logix didnt giv all the details but he said it was in cambridge so i had a look there, out of interest logix, did u get the other parts 2 the question out, i couldnt do this part but did part (b) and used that result in part (a), oh well, these inequalities are a bitch anyway
-dawso

 

[Archman]

basically, ya method is not strong enough, gotta shop around a bit more.