28FEB
New Member
If you had a choice to change your subject saying, from advaned english to standard, should you? If you thought that you would do better at the other
DILEMMA of CHOICE
DILEMMA of CHOICE
Quoted for truth.watatank said:its not the subjects themselves its how well you go in them.
they scale they exact same.28FEB said:else LOL
nah.. im just wondering cos apparently its better to just pass in avd eng than to get 80 in standard, avd does more for your uai or sumfing
risole91 said:they scale they exact same.
standard is marked much harder, so a 70 on adv is the same as a 70 in std.
but its much easier to obtain an 80 in adv then std.
so my teacher tells me, hes a hsc marker.
That is so wrong.risole91 said:they scale they exact same.
standard is marked much harder, so a 70 on adv is the same as a 70 in std.
but its much easier to obtain an 80 in adv then std.
so my teacher tells me, hes a hsc marker.
To quote from another UAC source on this subject (the paper can be found at http://www.uac.edu.au/pubs/pdf/uacnews/news_vol8issue1.pdf)markzada said:That is so wrong.
http://www.uac.edu.au/pubs/pdf/2007_table_A3.pdf
Look at English Standard and English Advanced. That table states the HSC Mark achieved compared with the Scaled Aggregate (the mark that is used for calculating UAI - nobody gets this).
As can be seen Standard gets scaled a lot worse than advanced. Hence, a 70 in Standard is not the same as a 70 in Advanced irrespective of how hard they mark either one (although in my opinion advanced is marked harder as they expect more - but that's just me!).
In short, Advanced and Standard English are scaled the same (as in the same raw exam mark will give the same scaled aggregate mark), the apparent anomaly comes from the fact that different raw exam marks will produce the same HSC exam mark presented to the student in either course, i.e. a higher raw exam mark is needed to give the same HSC exam mark in Standard than Advanced.English was scaled as a single group but Standard and Advanced were separated for purposes of reporting. Neither Advanced nor Standard students were advantaged or disadvantaged as a result of scaling. The apparent anomaly results from the fact that:
the common scale for Standard and Advanced marks determined on the basis of raw marks differed from the common scale determined on the basis of the Board's aligned marks
the UAI is based on raw HSC marks rather than the Board's HSC marks that are reported to students.
In summary:
1. Raw Standard and Advanced examination marks were placed on a common scale by statistical equating using the common 2 unit paper that all English students completed. School assessments were moderated using these raw examination marks. A raw HSC mark was then calculated as the sum of the examination mark and moderated school assessment.
2. After scaling, a raw HSC mark yielded the same scaled mark, whether from a Standard or Advanced student.
3. The Board used judges to align the Standard and Advanced examination marks against the standards defined by the Performance Band Descriptors in English.
4. The common scale so determined for the Board's HSC marks was slightly different from that established by statistical equating: the same raw HSC mark corresponded to different Board HSC marks for Standard and Advanced students, with Advanced students receiving the higher mark.
5. Consequently, while the same raw HSC mark yielded the same scaled mark, the same was not true for the Board's HSC marks. While Standard and Advanced marks were combined for scaling they were separated for the purposes of reporting. As neither schools nor students have knowledge of the raw marks, scaled marks had to be related to the Board's HSC marks reported to students. This led to the misapprehension that Advanced students were disadvantaged in some way by the scaling process - this was not so. Advanced students received due acknowledgment for their achievement both in relation to the UAI and the reported HSC mark.
blakegman said:
read soulsearchers post buddy.markzada said:Your still wrong.
Raw marks are used in the scaling process.
A raw mark of 60 in standard is scaled the same as 60 in advanced. But a 60 in standard may be only equivalent to a 58 HSC Mark whereas a 60 in Advanced may be equivalent to a 70 HSC Mark.
The fact that raw marks are used in the scaling process doesn't make you right?
its saying theres a minor technacality.markzada said:Read part 5 of SoulSearcher's response (quoted from UAC).
You're wrong.