I got the same answer (basically) and wolfram gives it exactly as you have it http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp?expr=(25-x^2)^(1/2)&random=false
What would have been wrong with my answer from lyounamu's p.o.v?tommykins said:shaon0's working is correct.
Woah mad...do you have to pay for this?lolokay said:I got the same answer (basically) and wolfram gives it exactly as you have it http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp?expr=(25-x^2)^(1/2)&random=false
I don't know.shaon0 said:What would have been wrong with my answer from lyounamu's p.o.v?
Sorry, I didn't know that you could approach the question in that way. But tell me how you approached it.shaon0 said:What would have been wrong with my answer from lyounamu's p.o.v?
ah sorry yeah.. my mistake.. been doing english all last week.. literally..tommykins said:Not entirely correct. It's also 25/2[sin2@/2 + @] , not 25/4.
You need to revert the @'s back into x's.
Ok i did.lyounamu said:Sorry, I didn't know that you could approach the question in that way. But tell me how you approached it.
mainly by looking at examples and reading up on concepts.tacogym27101990 said:wow you taught yourself how to do that?
impressive
Holy crap. That's pretty hectic. .shaon0 said:mainly by looking at examples and reading up on concepts.
Thanks. Substitution is the easiest way but i kind of figured out another way.tommykins said:Lol, he obviously does it for a response. Just ignore him, he's all talk.
shaon0 - great job, I thought you found out a new way, didn't know you used trig subs, awesome work nonetheless.
Thanks...i kind of skipped doing all my maths homework ie. plane geometry, to learn calculus. I've finished volumes of revolution (or solids of revolution) now.12o9 said:Holy crap. That's pretty hectic. .
It'd be a huge hassle I think.shaon0 said:Thanks. Substitution is the easiest way but i kind of figured out another way.
Can you use integration by parts? since, (25-x^2)=(5-x)(5+x)
no i dont think i.b.p would work hereshaon0 said:Thanks. Substitution is the easiest way but i kind of figured out another way.
Can you use integration by parts? since, (25-x^2)=(5-x)(5+x)
yeah, something like that.tacogym27101990 said:no i dont think i.b.p would work here
but even if it did it would be really unneccesarry
what were you planning to do
let u=rt(5-x) and v'=rt(5+x)dx???
lol @ 2U ppl not knowin wat u 4U guys are doin, next ur gonna invade the general maths forums, where u wont be welcomed lmaoAaron.Judd said:Damn I got lost.
Haha, well that question was in our 2U past paper (we have trials tomorrow), and we were like, OMGWTF - haven't learnt how to integrate that yet.Pwnage101 said:lol @ 2U ppl not knowin wat u 4U guys are doin, next ur gonna invade the general maths forums, where u wont be welcomed lmao