nerdasdasd
Dont.msg.me.about.english
Am I allowed to upload the 2012 paper?
For processes, I wrote about how the Control Centre would need to be able to differentiate between the data and video feeds sent from each of the robots in order to usefully display the data as information. I also wrote that a faulty sensor on a robot may be displayed based upon GPS data being processed in relation to areas in which the sensors should pick up static readings reporting variable readings on one of the robots. I think that I bullshitted this question more than any of the other questions in AMS, and was a bit skeptical with my response.LOl bro AMS was a dream come true. Lucky i Prepared for TPS,MM & AMS. All those sensor questions were easy. What did you write for the question about the Control Centre and IPTRobot in AMS?
this is the exact problem with the exam. It should have been much more to syllabus dot point instead of BS, so people who were knowledgeable with the syllabus and had a full understanding eg. extensive study, should have done better than those who have not studies. Instead they structured it so at least 80% of the course wasn't tested and the rest was general knowedge bullcrap.i cant believe everyone thinks that they are going to fail this exam so bad, and how much harder it was compared to the other years'. personally, i thought it was pretty straight forward, not a huge amount of detail of the course was required at all. ipt has always been my weakest subject and i only did like one day of study for it and think ill get ~85 raw mark. anyone else think it was easy too?
I agree with you. But in question 22a we had to draw a context diagram.this is the exact problem with the exam. It should have been much more to syllabus dot point instead of BS, so people who were knowledgeable with the syllabus and had a full understanding eg. extensive study, should have done better than those who have not studies. Instead they structured it so at least 80% of the course wasn't tested and the rest was general knowedge bullcrap.
Good on you though for doing well, not condemning, just saying its annoying how it seemed to 'address' the syllabus. no DFD's, no context diagrams, no data dictionaries, no SQL I mean come on BOS!
Are you sure it wanted you to draw a context diagram? because it seemed like that whole question 22 section was for communication not project managementI agree with you. But in question 22a we had to draw a context diagram.
You didn't have to draw a CFD. You literally had to draw a diagram of a car, the transmission medium and the base server. There was no need to draw a CFD and/or DFD in the exam.Are you sure it wanted you to draw a context diagram? because it seemed like that whole question 22 section was for communication not project management
Crap, i just wrote the words of the processes needed and drew arrows between each of them.You didn't have to draw a CFD. You literally had to draw a diagram of a car, the transmission medium and the base server. There was no need to draw a CFD and/or DFD in the exam.
Haha, BOS are such trolls. I was quietly laughing knowing all the people who will get it wrongso who else here enjoyed seeing question 9
What was question 9 again?Haha, BOS are such trolls. I was quietly laughing knowing all the people who will get it wrong